Exploring the impact of digital scaffolding on collaborative writing practices

This study investigates the impact of modern technological tools, specifically the Framapad online word processor and the Moodle platform, on collaborative writing among second language (L2) students in Algerian universities. The study involved 24 third-year French as a second language students, divided into a control (GT) and experimental (GE) group, each comprising three subgroups. The data were analysed in two phases: initial and revision. Initially, the produced fables were evaluated based on four criteria: structure, content, language, and collaborative writing. In the revision stage, the produced fables were analysed, focusing on the textual changes made—additions, deletions, replacements, and text rearrangements. A comparative assessment was conducted to examine the impact of technology on the quality and creativity of collaborative writing. The results reveal that the experimental group outperformed the control group in structuring fables, exhibiting better integration of plot and moral elements. Both groups addressed Algerian issues, but the experimental group displayed greater creativity. The experimental group demonstrated more effective teamwork and tended to enhance storytelling during revisions by adding more elements and deleting fewer than the control group. These results highlight the potential benefits of integrating technology into language learning contexts to improve writing proficiency and foster collaborative skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05606-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the impact of digital scaffolding on collaborative writing practices

Muath Algazo, Sharif M. Alghazo, Souad Benabbes
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Writing and Handwriting Education
8.93
article

Exploring the impact of digital scaffolding on collaborative writing practices

Muath Algazo, Sharif M. Alghazo, Souad Benabbes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of modern technological tools, specifically the Framapad online word processor and the Moodle platform, on collaborative writing among second language (L2) students in Algerian universities. The study involved 24 third-year French as a second language students, divided into a control (GT) and experimental (GE) group, each comprising three subgroups. The data were analysed in two phases: initial and revision. Initially, the produced fables were evaluated based on four criteria: structure, content, language, and collaborative writing. In the revision stage, the produced fables were analysed, focusing on the textual changes made—additions, deletions, replacements, and text rearrangements. A comparative assessment was conducted to examine the impact of technology on the quality and creativity of collaborative writing. The results reveal that the experimental group outperformed the control group in structuring fables, exhibiting better integration of plot and moral elements. Both groups addressed Algerian issues, but the experimental group displayed greater creativity. The experimental group demonstrated more effective teamwork and tended to enhance storytelling during revisions by adding more elements and deleting fewer than the control group. These results highlight the potential benefits of integrating technology into language learning contexts to improve writing proficiency and foster collaborative skills.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
University of Jordan (JO), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan (JO), University of Sharjah (AE), Larbi Ben M'hidi University of Oum El Bouaghi (DZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Writing and Handwriting Education
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.