Maximal Respiratory Muscle Strength in Singaporean Adults: Normative Reference Values and Predictive Models from a Cross-Sectional Study

Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) are commonly used proxies to measure respiratory muscle strength. Current literature lacks recent large-scale normative reference values (NRV) for these pressures in healthy Singaporean adults. Moreover, no consensus exists on the variables that could influence MIP and MEP. This cross-sectional study aims to: (1) establish the NRV of MIP and MEP; (2) determine the correlations of variables that could influence these pressures; and (3) develop regression equations using non-spirometry variables to estimate reference values for MIP and MEP in the healthy Singaporean population aged 21 to 80 years. MIP and MEP were measured alongside demographic and anthropometric data collected from 391 participants (202 females, 189 males) recruited via convenience sampling. Median MIP and MEP values were significantly higher in males (112 and 85 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) than in females (83 and 64 cmH<sub>2</sub>O). Spearman correlations revealed significant associations between MIP/MEP and gender, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio, and spirometric variables. Regression models using age, gender, height, and weight explained 27.5% and 32.1% of the variance in MIP and MEP, respectively. This study updated the NRV of MIP and MEP and provided practical predictive equations for assessing respiratory muscle strength in Singapore.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Muscles
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/muscles4040047
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximal Respiratory Muscle Strength in Singaporean Adults: Normative Reference Values and Predictive Models from a Cross-Sectional Study

Katherin S. Huang, Ji-myung Woo, Shiwei Liang, Farah Roslan et al.
Muscles
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Maximal Respiratory Muscle Strength in Singaporean Adults: Normative Reference Values and Predictive Models from a Cross-Sectional Study

Katherin S. Huang, Ji-myung Woo, Shiwei Liang, Farah Roslan, Ha-Young Cheong, Winnie Lau, Kian-Wee Tan, Meredith T. Yeung, Kim Swee
article en

Abstract

Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) are commonly used proxies to measure respiratory muscle strength. Current literature lacks recent large-scale normative reference values (NRV) for these pressures in healthy Singaporean adults. Moreover, no consensus exists on the variables that could influence MIP and MEP. This cross-sectional study aims to: (1) establish the NRV of MIP and MEP; (2) determine the correlations of variables that could influence these pressures; and (3) develop regression equations using non-spirometry variables to estimate reference values for MIP and MEP in the healthy Singaporean population aged 21 to 80 years. MIP and MEP were measured alongside demographic and anthropometric data collected from 391 participants (202 females, 189 males) recruited via convenience sampling. Median MIP and MEP values were significantly higher in males (112 and 85 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) than in females (83 and 64 cmH<sub>2</sub>O). Spearman correlations revealed significant associations between MIP/MEP and gender, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio, and spirometric variables. Regression models using age, gender, height, and weight explained 27.5% and 32.1% of the variance in MIP and MEP, respectively. This study updated the NRV of MIP and MEP and provided practical predictive equations for assessing respiratory muscle strength in Singapore.

MusclesVol. 4(4)
Singapore Institute of Technology (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.