Percutaneous Transplant Liver Biopsies: Does Biopsy Needle Gauge Matter?

Introduction This study evaluates coaxial core needle size (17/18G vs 19/20G) and sample adequacy in liver transplant biopsies. Materials and methods This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective study of 397 percutaneous transplant liver biopsies performed over four years with 17G/18G or 19G/20G coaxial and core needles. Medical records were reviewed for needle size, number of cores, tract embolization, complications, and sample adequacy by pathology. Statistical significance was determined using a combination of t-tests and chi-squared tests with a significance level less than 0.05. Results There were 257 18G core biopsies and 140 20G biopsies. Sample inadequacy was noted in 3/257 of the 18G biopsies and 19/140 of the 20G biopsies (p<0.0001). The mean number of cores taken was 3.17±0.72 and 3.06±0.81 for 18G and 20G biopsies, respectively (p=0.14). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of cores taken in the adequate or inadequate samples. Tract embolization was performed in 353/397 biopsies. One clinically significant bleeding complication was noted in a procedure done with a 20G needle with two core biopsies. No other major complications were noted. Conclusion Random transplant liver biopsies performed with coaxial 17G/18G core biopsy needles are more likely to provide adequate results than biopsies performed with 19G/20G needles. The risk of complications in transplant liver biopsies is low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.94978
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Percutaneous Transplant Liver Biopsies: Does Biopsy Needle Gauge Matter?

John Filtes, Abin Sajan, Joshua Weintraub, Heejin Bae et al.
Cureus
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Percutaneous Transplant Liver Biopsies: Does Biopsy Needle Gauge Matter?

John Filtes, Abin Sajan, Joshua Weintraub, Heejin Bae, Stephen P. Reis, Asad Baig, Lindsay Young, Connie Liou, Kiyon Naser-Tavakolian, S. Brejt
article en

Abstract

Introduction This study evaluates coaxial core needle size (17/18G vs 19/20G) and sample adequacy in liver transplant biopsies. Materials and methods This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective study of 397 percutaneous transplant liver biopsies performed over four years with 17G/18G or 19G/20G coaxial and core needles. Medical records were reviewed for needle size, number of cores, tract embolization, complications, and sample adequacy by pathology. Statistical significance was determined using a combination of t-tests and chi-squared tests with a significance level less than 0.05. Results There were 257 18G core biopsies and 140 20G biopsies. Sample inadequacy was noted in 3/257 of the 18G biopsies and 19/140 of the 20G biopsies (p<0.0001). The mean number of cores taken was 3.17±0.72 and 3.06±0.81 for 18G and 20G biopsies, respectively (p=0.14). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of cores taken in the adequate or inadequate samples. Tract embolization was performed in 353/397 biopsies. One clinically significant bleeding complication was noted in a procedure done with a 20G needle with two core biopsies. No other major complications were noted. Conclusion Random transplant liver biopsies performed with coaxial 17G/18G core biopsy needles are more likely to provide adequate results than biopsies performed with 19G/20G needles. The risk of complications in transplant liver biopsies is low.

CureusVol. 17(10)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Society of Interventional Radiology (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.