Examining the Direct and Indirect Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Colorectal Cancer Using Structural Equation Modeling

The direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic status (SES) on colorectal cancer (CRC) were examined using structural equation modeling in a case-control study with 488 CRCs and 651 controls. SES was measured by education, income and resident region. SES (odds ratio (OR)=0.89), age (OR = 1.03), processed meat intake (OR = 1.08), lack of CRC screening (OR = 2.67), smoking (OR = 1.85) and family history (OR = 1.06) were significantly associated with CRC risk. SES had a direct effect on CRC risk (β = -0.05). An indirect effect of SES on CRC also existed which was mediated by processed meat intake (β = -0.02), vegetable intake (β = -0.01), CRC screening uptake (β = -0.02), and smoking (β = -0.02).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Investigation
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2025.2570382
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Direct and Indirect Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Colorectal Cancer Using Structural Equation Modeling

Jing Zhao, Esther M. John, Patrick S. Parfrey, Yun Zhu et al.
1 citations
Cancer Investigation
Nutritional Studies and Diet
1.88
article

Examining the Direct and Indirect Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Colorectal Cancer Using Structural Equation Modeling

Jing Zhao, Esther M. John, Patrick S. Parfrey, Yun Zhu, Peter Wang, Keming Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic status (SES) on colorectal cancer (CRC) were examined using structural equation modeling in a case-control study with 488 CRCs and 651 controls. SES was measured by education, income and resident region. SES (odds ratio (OR)=0.89), age (OR = 1.03), processed meat intake (OR = 1.08), lack of CRC screening (OR = 2.67), smoking (OR = 1.85) and family history (OR = 1.06) were significantly associated with CRC risk. SES had a direct effect on CRC risk (β = -0.05). An indirect effect of SES on CRC also existed which was mediated by processed meat intake (β = -0.02), vegetable intake (β = -0.01), CRC screening uptake (β = -0.02), and smoking (β = -0.02).

Cancer InvestigationVol. 43(9)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Carolinas Healthcare System (US), 3M (United States) (US), University of Toronto (CA), Immigrant Institute (SE), First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.