Evaluation of the RHAM-based Pluslife Rapid SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison with EasyNAT Rapid SARS-CoV-2 assay and Wondfo 2019-nCoV antigen assay

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains a significant public health challenge. This study evaluated the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 assay employing proprietary RNase Hybridization-Assisted amplification (RHAM) isothermal amplification technology, with comparative performance assessment against the EasyNAT Rapid SARS-CoV-2 assay and the Wondfo 2019-nCoV antigen assay. Analytical testing determined the Pluslife assay's limit of detection to be 400 copies/mL, with no cross-reactivity against common respiratory viruses and no interference from tested substances. Using RT-qPCR as the reference standard on 197 nasopharyngeal swabs, the Pluslife assay showed a positive percentage agreement (PPA) of 96.30% and a negative percentage agreement (NPA) of 99.30% (<i>κ</i> = 0.962, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The EasyNAT assay demonstrated a PPA of 96.30% and NPA of 98.60% (<i>κ</i> = 0.949, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The Wondfo antigen assay showed a PPA of 81.48% and NPA of 100% (<i>κ</i> = 0.865, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The Pluslife assay demonstrates comparable diagnostic accuracy to EasyNAT for SARS-CoV-2 detection, while offering advantages in portability, speed, and cost. Its performance significantly exceeded that of the Wondfo antigen assay, particularly in reducing false negatives. The Pluslife Mini Dock platform shows potential for rapid SARS-CoV-2 screening in diverse settings.IMPORTANCEThe newly developed Pluslife Rapid severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) assay is a next-generation molecular point-of-care testing (POCT) method, based on RNase Hybridization-Assisted amplification (RHAM), a self-developed isothermal amplification molecular detection technology of Pluslife Biotech. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of this new SARS-CoV-2 POCT method and compare the clinical performance with the EasyNAT Rapid SARS-CoV-2 assay and the Wondfo 2019-nCoV antigen assay. The results of this study are of great significance to clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microbiology Spectrum
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03418-24
Citations
1
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the RHAM-based Pluslife Rapid SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison with EasyNAT Rapid SARS-CoV-2 assay and Wondfo 2019-nCoV antigen assay

Mingyong Luo, Xuegao Yu, Huanliang Liu, Bin Huang et al.
1 citations
Microbiology Spectrum
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
1.40
article

Evaluation of the RHAM-based Pluslife Rapid SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison with EasyNAT Rapid SARS-CoV-2 assay and Wondfo 2019-nCoV antigen assay

Mingyong Luo, Xuegao Yu, Huanliang Liu, Bin Huang, Shibing Li, Tingting Yang, Yuting He, Chen Cha, Zhiwei Zhao, Guosheng Zhong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains a significant public health challenge. This study evaluated the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 assay employing proprietary RNase Hybridization-Assisted amplification (RHAM) isothermal amplification technology, with comparative performance assessment against the EasyNAT Rapid SARS-CoV-2 assay and the Wondfo 2019-nCoV antigen assay. Analytical testing determined the Pluslife assay's limit of detection to be 400 copies/mL, with no cross-reactivity against common respiratory viruses and no interference from tested substances. Using RT-qPCR as the reference standard on 197 nasopharyngeal swabs, the Pluslife assay showed a positive percentage agreement (PPA) of 96.30% and a negative percentage agreement (NPA) of 99.30% (<i>κ</i> = 0.962, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The EasyNAT assay demonstrated a PPA of 96.30% and NPA of 98.60% (<i>κ</i> = 0.949, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The Wondfo antigen assay showed a PPA of 81.48% and NPA of 100% (<i>κ</i> = 0.865, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The Pluslife assay demonstrates comparable diagnostic accuracy to EasyNAT for SARS-CoV-2 detection, while offering advantages in portability, speed, and cost. Its performance significantly exceeded that of the Wondfo antigen assay, particularly in reducing false negatives. The Pluslife Mini Dock platform shows potential for rapid SARS-CoV-2 screening in diverse settings.IMPORTANCEThe newly developed Pluslife Rapid severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) assay is a next-generation molecular point-of-care testing (POCT) method, based on RNase Hybridization-Assisted amplification (RHAM), a self-developed isothermal amplification molecular detection technology of Pluslife Biotech. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of this new SARS-CoV-2 POCT method and compare the clinical performance with the EasyNAT Rapid SARS-CoV-2 assay and the Wondfo 2019-nCoV antigen assay. The results of this study are of great significance to clinical practice.

Microbiology SpectrumVol. 13(12)
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Women's and Children's Hospital (AU), Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Guangdong Province Women and Children Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.