Efficacy and safety of European Medicines Agency ( <scp>EMA</scp> )‐approved pharmacological, endoscopic, and surgical treatments in different classes of obesity: A network meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials for the development of the <scp

In patients affected by mild to moderate obesity, newer OMMs (i.e., tirzepatide and semaglutide) appear to be valid alternatives to EBP and MBS. They could be preliminarily chosen as a first-line option based on similar efficacy and greater safety and tolerability. Higher degrees of obesity could be more effectively treated with MBS, the efficacy of which, with the notable exception of LAGB and GCP, appears superior to other treatments, especially in the long term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70204
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of European Medicines Agency ( EMA )‐approved pharmacological, endoscopic, and surgical treatments in different classes of obesity: A network meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials for the development of the <scp

Giovanni Antonio Silverii, Benedetta Ragghianti, Amanda Belluzzi, Paolo Sbraccia et al.
1 citations
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
2.01
article

Efficacy and safety of European Medicines Agency ( EMA )‐approved pharmacological, endoscopic, and surgical treatments in different classes of obesity: A network meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials for the development of the <scp

Giovanni Antonio Silverii, Benedetta Ragghianti, Amanda Belluzzi, Paolo Sbraccia, Gian Maria Busetto, Silvio Buscemi, Giuseppe Navarra, Matteo Monami, Edoardo Mannucci, Maurizio De Luca, Rocco Barazzoni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In patients affected by mild to moderate obesity, newer OMMs (i.e., tirzepatide and semaglutide) appear to be valid alternatives to EBP and MBS. They could be preliminarily chosen as a first-line option based on similar efficacy and greater safety and tolerability. Higher degrees of obesity could be more effectively treated with MBS, the efficacy of which, with the notable exception of LAGB and GCP, appears superior to other treatments, especially in the long term.

Diabetes Obesity and MetabolismVol. 28(1)
University of Messina (IT), University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Padua (IT), University of Trieste (IT), Italian Society of Physiotherapy (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Rovigo (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.