Clustering energy performance certificates: a methodology for selecting representative buildings in scalable energy simulations

This study presents a methodology for selecting representative buildings through clustering of Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) features. The six-phase workflow includes EPC attribute preparation, clustering with K-Medoids, Agglomerative clustering, and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), and internal validation using Silhouette, Calinski-Harabasz, and Davies-Bouldin indices. An EPC database of educational buildings in Helsinki is utilised to demonstrate the applicability of scalable energy simulations. To assess thermal validity, regression models: Linear, Random Forest, and XGBoost were trained within clusters to predict District Heating (DH) demand from outdoor temperature, achieving higher accuracy than global models. Additionally, DH clustering was compared to EPC-derived labels using the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) and Normalized Mutual Information. Formal statistical differentiation tests: ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis with FDR correction confirmed that EPC attributes differ significantly between clusters, and medoid buildings were shown to represent cluster means, with r ranging from 0.92 to 0.98. Results show that EPC-based clusters capture thermal behaviour, enabling the selection of representative buildings without continuous monitoring. Across internal cluster validity indices, Agglomerative clustering often performed best, while externally, GMM showed the strongest alignment with DH–based clusters with ARI = 0.555 and NMI = 0.571. Four clusters were identified from linkage distance and thermal performance. Feature importance analysis highlighted air leakage rate as the dominant predictor, with UA value and EP value also influential. This generalizable methodology enables meaningful building grouping and simulation targeting without detailed metering, supporting energy policy and retrofit planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116592
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clustering energy performance certificates: a methodology for selecting representative buildings in scalable energy simulations

Heikki Mannila, Andrea Ferrantelli, Collin Leiber, Kalevi Härkönen et al.
Energy and Buildings
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Clustering energy performance certificates: a methodology for selecting representative buildings in scalable energy simulations

Heikki Mannila, Andrea Ferrantelli, Collin Leiber, Kalevi Härkönen, Hatef Hajian
article en

Abstract

This study presents a methodology for selecting representative buildings through clustering of Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) features. The six-phase workflow includes EPC attribute preparation, clustering with K-Medoids, Agglomerative clustering, and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), and internal validation using Silhouette, Calinski-Harabasz, and Davies-Bouldin indices. An EPC database of educational buildings in Helsinki is utilised to demonstrate the applicability of scalable energy simulations. To assess thermal validity, regression models: Linear, Random Forest, and XGBoost were trained within clusters to predict District Heating (DH) demand from outdoor temperature, achieving higher accuracy than global models. Additionally, DH clustering was compared to EPC-derived labels using the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) and Normalized Mutual Information. Formal statistical differentiation tests: ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis with FDR correction confirmed that EPC attributes differ significantly between clusters, and medoid buildings were shown to represent cluster means, with r ranging from 0.92 to 0.98. Results show that EPC-based clusters capture thermal behaviour, enabling the selection of representative buildings without continuous monitoring. Across internal cluster validity indices, Agglomerative clustering often performed best, while externally, GMM showed the strongest alignment with DH–based clusters with ARI = 0.555 and NMI = 0.571. Four clusters were identified from linkage distance and thermal performance. Feature importance analysis highlighted air leakage rate as the dominant predictor, with UA value and EP value also influential. This generalizable methodology enables meaningful building grouping and simulation targeting without detailed metering, supporting energy policy and retrofit planning.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 350
Tallinn University of Technology (EE), University of Helsinki (FI), Finnish Environment Institute (FI), Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.