Evaluating the reliability of a revised two-step assessment of sex and gender in adolescents and adults

This study assessed the reliability of an updated two-step measure of gender and sex. Gender diverse youths (<i>n</i> = 610, <i>Mean</i> <sub>age</sub> = 15 years, <i>SD</i> = 2) and their parents (<i>n</i> = 606, <i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 48, <i>SD</i> = 5) completed a measure of sex and gender twice with a time delay of 30-60 minutes. Reliability was high, with 95% or higher agreement for sex and gender for both parents and youths. Reliability was highest for parents and for cisgender and transgender boys and girls, slightly lower for nonbinary youths, and lowest for youths who selected other options (e.g., "I don't know"). The two-step measure showed high levels of convergent validity as well. Results demonstrate that the two-step assessment with updated response options reliably identified participants' sex and gender, and these responses could be combined to classify gender modality, including to identify transgender individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2575304
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the reliability of a revised two-step assessment of sex and gender in adolescents and adults

Susan A. Gelman, Megan J. Heise, Natalie M. Gallagher, Christopher McGhee et al.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Evaluating the reliability of a revised two-step assessment of sex and gender in adolescents and adults

Susan A. Gelman, Megan J. Heise, Natalie M. Gallagher, Christopher McGhee, Kristina R. Olson
article en

Abstract

This study assessed the reliability of an updated two-step measure of gender and sex. Gender diverse youths (<i>n</i> = 610, <i>Mean</i> <sub>age</sub> = 15 years, <i>SD</i> = 2) and their parents (<i>n</i> = 606, <i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 48, <i>SD</i> = 5) completed a measure of sex and gender twice with a time delay of 30-60 minutes. Reliability was high, with 95% or higher agreement for sex and gender for both parents and youths. Reliability was highest for parents and for cisgender and transgender boys and girls, slightly lower for nonbinary youths, and lowest for youths who selected other options (e.g., "I don't know"). The two-step measure showed high levels of convergent validity as well. Results demonstrate that the two-step assessment with updated response options reliably identified participants' sex and gender, and these responses could be combined to classify gender modality, including to identify transgender individuals.

International Journal of Social Research Methodology
University of California, San Francisco (US), Princeton University (US), University of Michigan (US), University of California System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.