Moral distress: Exploring the experiences of rural clinic nurses

<b>Background:</b> Moral distress can negatively impact nurses, patients, and the healthcare system and has been well-documented in high-acuity care environments. Levels of moral distress and experiences of moral distress have been reported as high and severe among nurses in high-acuity care environments; however, the levels and experience of moral distress are unknown in rural clinic nurses. <b>Research Question/Aim/Objectives:</b> This study sought to gain a broader understanding of moral distress in nurses working in rural clinic settings. The aims were (1) Determine the level of moral distress among rural clinic nurses; (2) Examine the relationships of moral distress levels, demographic characteristics, and work experience variables of rural clinic nurses; (3) Identify themes regarding the perceived experiences of moral distress of nurses working in rural clinics; (4) Explore how aspects of rural practice impact moral distress for rural clinic nurses. <b>Research Design:</b> Convergent mixed methodology gathered quantitative and qualitative data in parallel, employed correlation and thematic analysis, respectively, then data were merged. <b>Participants and Research Context:</b> Informed by Rural Nursing Theory, a consecutive sample of 52 nurses across four states were surveyed using the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals and narrative questions. <b>Ethical Considerations:</b> The healthcare system and University IRBs granted exempt status. <b>Findings/Results:</b> The mean moral distress was 74.7 (SD = 76.8), range was 0 to 246, and no significant relationships were found between moral distress, demographics, or work experience variables. Four main themes were identified: (1) Lack [of something] Leads to Moral Distress (2) Barriers to Patient Care and Adherence (3) Inappropriate Healthcare Utilization (4) Care and Practice Factors that Lead to Moral Distress. <b>Conclusions:</b> Rural clinic nurses experience moral distress for reasons unique to rural practice, while other triggers are shared with urban nurses. Further research is warranted on sources of moral distress for rural clinic nurses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251387209
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moral distress: Exploring the experiences of rural clinic nurses

Dawn L. Denny, Rhoda A. Owens, Susan Bard Johnson
1 citations
Nursing Ethics
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
article

Moral distress: Exploring the experiences of rural clinic nurses

Dawn L. Denny, Rhoda A. Owens, Susan Bard Johnson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Moral distress can negatively impact nurses, patients, and the healthcare system and has been well-documented in high-acuity care environments. Levels of moral distress and experiences of moral distress have been reported as high and severe among nurses in high-acuity care environments; however, the levels and experience of moral distress are unknown in rural clinic nurses. <b>Research Question/Aim/Objectives:</b> This study sought to gain a broader understanding of moral distress in nurses working in rural clinic settings. The aims were (1) Determine the level of moral distress among rural clinic nurses; (2) Examine the relationships of moral distress levels, demographic characteristics, and work experience variables of rural clinic nurses; (3) Identify themes regarding the perceived experiences of moral distress of nurses working in rural clinics; (4) Explore how aspects of rural practice impact moral distress for rural clinic nurses. <b>Research Design:</b> Convergent mixed methodology gathered quantitative and qualitative data in parallel, employed correlation and thematic analysis, respectively, then data were merged. <b>Participants and Research Context:</b> Informed by Rural Nursing Theory, a consecutive sample of 52 nurses across four states were surveyed using the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals and narrative questions. <b>Ethical Considerations:</b> The healthcare system and University IRBs granted exempt status. <b>Findings/Results:</b> The mean moral distress was 74.7 (SD = 76.8), range was 0 to 246, and no significant relationships were found between moral distress, demographics, or work experience variables. Four main themes were identified: (1) Lack [of something] Leads to Moral Distress (2) Barriers to Patient Care and Adherence (3) Inappropriate Healthcare Utilization (4) Care and Practice Factors that Lead to Moral Distress. <b>Conclusions:</b> Rural clinic nurses experience moral distress for reasons unique to rural practice, while other triggers are shared with urban nurses. Further research is warranted on sources of moral distress for rural clinic nurses.

Nursing EthicsVol. 33(2)
Sanford Health (US), University of North Dakota (US), University of Jamestown (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.