The need for a science of patient and public involvement and participation in child and adolescent mental health research

There is an urgent need for a rigorous science of patient and public participation, involvement and engagement (PPIE) in child and adolescent mental health research. In this Perspective we argue that current PPIE practices lack solid theoretical foundations and require systematic evaluation of their epistemic and ethical impacts. We call for the development of clear concepts of ‘lived experience’ and ‘voice’ and the establishment of a shared framework to assess the value of PPIE in advancing discovery science. We end with ten initial questions to advance open, multi-stakeholder dialogue and debate on PPIE in the field. In this Perspective, Singh et al. examine the growing role of patient and public participation, involvement and engagement in discovery science, highlighting the need for clearer guidance in the context of youth mental health research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Mental Health
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-025-00497-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The need for a science of patient and public involvement and participation in child and adolescent mental health research

Lucienne Spencer, Essi Viding, Zeba R. Kokan, Ilina Singh et al.
2 citations
Nature Mental Health
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
5.63
article

The need for a science of patient and public involvement and participation in child and adolescent mental health research

Lucienne Spencer, Essi Viding, Zeba R. Kokan, Ilina Singh, Argyris Stringaris, Charlotte Austin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

There is an urgent need for a rigorous science of patient and public participation, involvement and engagement (PPIE) in child and adolescent mental health research. In this Perspective we argue that current PPIE practices lack solid theoretical foundations and require systematic evaluation of their epistemic and ethical impacts. We call for the development of clear concepts of ‘lived experience’ and ‘voice’ and the establishment of a shared framework to assess the value of PPIE in advancing discovery science. We end with ten initial questions to advance open, multi-stakeholder dialogue and debate on PPIE in the field. In this Perspective, Singh et al. examine the growing role of patient and public participation, involvement and engagement in discovery science, highlighting the need for clearer guidance in the context of youth mental health research.

Nature Mental HealthVol. 3(11)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), University of Oxford (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.