Decimal systems around the world

Decimal numeral systems (base-10) are the most widespread type of counting system across the world's languages. Their ubiquity has often been attributed to presumed functional advantages, including ease of use, cognitive efficiency and arithmetical transparency. In principle, decimal systems represent numbers as compositions involving a form representing 10 and smaller atomic numerals (e.g. Mandarin <i>shí sān</i> 'thirteen', literally 'ten three'). In practice, however, many languages exhibit deviations that obscure this compositional logic-such as allomorphy (<i>fifteen</i> in English, as opposed to <i>five-ten</i>), suppletion (e.g. Russian <i>sorok</i> 'forty', unrelated to <i>četyre</i> 'four' or <i>desjat'</i> 'ten'), or secondary structures involving other compositional elements (e.g. 5). Despite being frequently mentioned in the literature, these violations have not been systematically analysed at scale. Here, we develop a rule-based classification of decimal systems and apply it to a curated, genealogically and geographically balanced sample of 118 languages. We assess each system along three dimensions-<i>transparency</i>, <i>canonicity</i> and <i>compositionality</i>-and show that, while surface-level irregularities are widespread, the underlying mathematical structure of decimal systems remains highly regular and patterned. These results reveal that deviations from perfect decimality are not random but instead reflect structured variation shaped by historical, cognitive and typological constraints.This article is part of the theme issue 'A solid base for scaling up: the structure of numeration systems'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2024.0211
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Categorization, perception, and language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decimal systems around the world

Ezequiel Koile, Damián E. Blasí
7 citations
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Categorization, perception, and language
14.83
article

Decimal systems around the world

Ezequiel Koile, Damián E. Blasí
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Decimal numeral systems (base-10) are the most widespread type of counting system across the world's languages. Their ubiquity has often been attributed to presumed functional advantages, including ease of use, cognitive efficiency and arithmetical transparency. In principle, decimal systems represent numbers as compositions involving a form representing 10 and smaller atomic numerals (e.g. Mandarin <i>shí sān</i> 'thirteen', literally 'ten three'). In practice, however, many languages exhibit deviations that obscure this compositional logic-such as allomorphy (<i>fifteen</i> in English, as opposed to <i>five-ten</i>), suppletion (e.g. Russian <i>sorok</i> 'forty', unrelated to <i>četyre</i> 'four' or <i>desjat'</i> 'ten'), or secondary structures involving other compositional elements (e.g. 5). Despite being frequently mentioned in the literature, these violations have not been systematically analysed at scale. Here, we develop a rule-based classification of decimal systems and apply it to a curated, genealogically and geographically balanced sample of 118 languages. We assess each system along three dimensions-<i>transparency</i>, <i>canonicity</i> and <i>compositionality</i>-and show that, while surface-level irregularities are widespread, the underlying mathematical structure of decimal systems remains highly regular and patterned. These results reveal that deviations from perfect decimality are not random but instead reflect structured variation shaped by historical, cognitive and typological constraints.This article is part of the theme issue 'A solid base for scaling up: the structure of numeration systems'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 380(1937)
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology (DE), Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Categorization, perception, and language
14.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.