Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence tools among University Students in Ghana

Despite the growing adoption of AI tools, few empirical studies have comprehensively examined students’ familiarity, perceived benefits and challenges, and demographic factors such as gender, age, and academic level. This study aims to explore the familiarity, usage, perceived benefits and challenges, and how demographic factors influence AI tool adoption among university students in Ghana. A cross-sectional design was employed, sampling 353 students through snowball and convenience sampling techniques via online platforms such as WhatsApp groups. A structured questionnaire was developed for data collection, with independent sample t-tests and ANOVA utilised to compare AI tool usage between genders and across various age groups and academic levels, respectively. The majority of students reported familiarity with tools such as MetaAI, ChatGPT, and Grammarly. Analysis indicated that male students used generative AI tools more frequently than their female counterparts. An independent samples t-test confirmed that this difference is statistically significant (t = 10.35, p < 0.001). Age also emerged as a significant factor (F = 110.46, p < 0.001), with younger students (under 25 years) engaging with generative AI tools more often than older age groups. A statistical difference was also observed related to students’ programme of study (F = 3.41, p < 0.002). No significant differences were noted across academic levels. Students perceived these tools as enhancing research efficiency, providing personalised learning support, and transforming education. However, they expressed concerns regarding the impact of these tools on critical thinking skills, the accuracy of generated information, and ethical implications. A balanced approach is needed to integrate generative AI tools in education, ensuring their benefits are maximised while addressing ethical concerns to preserve students’ critical thinking skills and uphold academic integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Education
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00608-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence tools among University Students in Ghana

Florence Akua Mensah, Isaac Nyarko Kwakye, Daniel Adom-Fynn, Kofi Abram Panyin Kwakye et al.
1 citations
Discover Education
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
article

Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence tools among University Students in Ghana

Florence Akua Mensah, Isaac Nyarko Kwakye, Daniel Adom-Fynn, Kofi Abram Panyin Kwakye, Samuel Dwamena Agyei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite the growing adoption of AI tools, few empirical studies have comprehensively examined students’ familiarity, perceived benefits and challenges, and demographic factors such as gender, age, and academic level. This study aims to explore the familiarity, usage, perceived benefits and challenges, and how demographic factors influence AI tool adoption among university students in Ghana. A cross-sectional design was employed, sampling 353 students through snowball and convenience sampling techniques via online platforms such as WhatsApp groups. A structured questionnaire was developed for data collection, with independent sample t-tests and ANOVA utilised to compare AI tool usage between genders and across various age groups and academic levels, respectively. The majority of students reported familiarity with tools such as MetaAI, ChatGPT, and Grammarly. Analysis indicated that male students used generative AI tools more frequently than their female counterparts. An independent samples t-test confirmed that this difference is statistically significant (t = 10.35, p < 0.001). Age also emerged as a significant factor (F = 110.46, p < 0.001), with younger students (under 25 years) engaging with generative AI tools more often than older age groups. A statistical difference was also observed related to students’ programme of study (F = 3.41, p < 0.002). No significant differences were noted across academic levels. Students perceived these tools as enhancing research efficiency, providing personalised learning support, and transforming education. However, they expressed concerns regarding the impact of these tools on critical thinking skills, the accuracy of generated information, and ethical implications. A balanced approach is needed to integrate generative AI tools in education, ensuring their benefits are maximised while addressing ethical concerns to preserve students’ critical thinking skills and uphold academic integrity.

Discover EducationVol. 4(1)
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (US), University of Ghana (GH), State Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Built Environment (CN), University for Development Studies (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.