The Devil is in the Details: Zooming out in Leadership Research

Abstract Leadership research has evolved towards increasing conceptual and methodological precision, yielding refined constructs and robust empirical insights. However, this editorial argues that a singular focus on precision risks fragmenting the field and distancing scholarship from the complex realities of organizational life. Drawing on contributions from JMS , this thematic collection illustrates how leadership is a dynamic, contextually embedded phenomenon shaped by interdependent forces. By ‘zooming out’, scholarship can better reflect the messy, adaptive nature of leadership and offer more actionable insights for leaders navigating today’s organizational challenges. We propose a multidimensional framework – breadth, depth, and height – to reintroduce complexity into leadership studies. Breadth captures the diversity of leadership styles and disciplinary perspectives; depth explores the psychological, symbolic, and relational undercurrents of those diverse perspectives; and height examines how diverse perspectives play out differently across hierarchical levels and systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Studies
Published
2025-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70013
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Devil is in the Details: Zooming out in Leadership Research

Yasin Rofcanın, Hannes Leroy, Chidiebere Ogbonnaya, Mirko H. Benischke et al.
2 citations
Journal of Management Studies
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
3.09
article

The Devil is in the Details: Zooming out in Leadership Research

Yasin Rofcanın, Hannes Leroy, Chidiebere Ogbonnaya, Mirko H. Benischke, Stav Fainshmidt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Leadership research has evolved towards increasing conceptual and methodological precision, yielding refined constructs and robust empirical insights. However, this editorial argues that a singular focus on precision risks fragmenting the field and distancing scholarship from the complex realities of organizational life. Drawing on contributions from JMS , this thematic collection illustrates how leadership is a dynamic, contextually embedded phenomenon shaped by interdependent forces. By ‘zooming out’, scholarship can better reflect the messy, adaptive nature of leadership and offer more actionable insights for leaders navigating today’s organizational challenges. We propose a multidimensional framework – breadth, depth, and height – to reintroduce complexity into leadership studies. Breadth captures the diversity of leadership styles and disciplinary perspectives; depth explores the psychological, symbolic, and relational undercurrents of those diverse perspectives; and height examines how diverse perspectives play out differently across hierarchical levels and systems.

Journal of Management StudiesVol. 62(8)
King's College London (GB), Florida International University (US), University of Bath (GB), Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.