The Occupational Hazard Facing Researchers in The Field of Aquaculture

The study primarily aimed to identify the occupational hazards facing researchers in the field of aquaculture sector by: profiling respondents’ general characteristics; determining their degree of exposure to hazards during work; identifying the occupational safety and health (OSH) measures available in their work environment and the extent to which respondents use them; assessing the application of OSH procedures and standards in the workplace; and compiling respondents’ suggestions for activating OSH standards in aquaculture settings. The research was conducted among researchers at the Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research (Abbassa). Sharkia Governorate. and covered 141 respondents. Data were collected through an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Frequencies. percentages. and the mean relative weight were used to rank statements by importance and to present the results.Key findings indicated that 52% of respondents had a high level of awareness of the concept of occupational hazards. and 60% had experienced work-related injuries. While 72% had received training courses in OSH. 70% of the total had attended only a small number of courses (one course). Respondents’ exposure to hazards during work ranged from moderate to high—57% and 43%. respectively. Regarding the OSH measures available in the work environment (as perceived by respondents). the most important were: provision of rest areas for researchers (the mean relative weight score = 2.89). followed by dedicated changing rooms (the mean relative weight = 2.63). Respondents’ use of OSH measures ranged from low to moderate (23% and 65%. respectively). Furthermore. 82% believed that OSH procedures and standards are applied to a moderate or low degree in the aquaculture field. The most prominent proposals to enhance OSH procedures and standards in aquaculture workplaces were: delivering training courses by OSH specialists (96%); distributing OSH guidance leaflets to researchers (91%); posting hazard-warning posters that explain risks and prevention methods (88%); preparing a report on every workplace incident (87%); and conducting routine inspection. maintenance. and cleaning of personal protective equipment after use (85%).The study primarily aimed to identify the occupational hazards facing researchers in the field of aquaculture sector by: profiling respondents’ general characteristics; determining their degree of exposure to hazards during work; identifying the occupational safety and health (OSH) measures available in their work environment and the extent to which respondents use them; assessing the application of OSH procedures and standards in the workplace; and compiling respondents’ suggestions for activating OSH standards in aquaculture settings. The research was conducted among researchers at the Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research (Abbassa). Sharkia Governorate. and covered 141 respondents. Data were collected through an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Frequencies. percentages. and the mean relative weight were used to rank statements by importance and to present the results.Key findings indicated that 52% of respondents had a high level of awareness of the concept of occupational hazards. and 60% had experienced work-related injuries. While 72% had received training courses in OSH. 70% of the total had attended only a small number of courses (one course). Respondents’ exposure to hazards during work ranged from moderate to high—57% and 43%. respectively. Regarding the OSH measures available in the work environment (as perceived by respondents). the most important were: provision of rest areas for researchers (the mean relative weight score = 2.89). followed by dedicated changing rooms (the mean relative weight = 2.63). Respondents’ use of OSH measures ranged from low to moderate (23% and 65%. respectively). Furthermore. 82% believed that OSH procedures and standards are applied to a moderate or low degree in the aquaculture field. The most prominent proposals to enhance OSH procedures and standards in aquaculture workplaces were: delivering training courses by OSH specialists (96%); distributing OSH guidance leaflets to researchers (91%); posting hazard-warning posters that explain risks and prevention methods (88%); preparing a report on every workplace incident (87%); and conducting routine inspection. maintenance. and cleaning of personal protective equipment after use (85%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alexandria Science Exchange Journal
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2025.458226
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Occupational Hazard Facing Researchers in The Field of Aquaculture

Francesca Soliman
Alexandria Science Exchange Journal
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

The Occupational Hazard Facing Researchers in The Field of Aquaculture

Francesca Soliman
article en

Abstract

The study primarily aimed to identify the occupational hazards facing researchers in the field of aquaculture sector by: profiling respondents’ general characteristics; determining their degree of exposure to hazards during work; identifying the occupational safety and health (OSH) measures available in their work environment and the extent to which respondents use them; assessing the application of OSH procedures and standards in the workplace; and compiling respondents’ suggestions for activating OSH standards in aquaculture settings. The research was conducted among researchers at the Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research (Abbassa). Sharkia Governorate. and covered 141 respondents. Data were collected through an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Frequencies. percentages. and the mean relative weight were used to rank statements by importance and to present the results.Key findings indicated that 52% of respondents had a high level of awareness of the concept of occupational hazards. and 60% had experienced work-related injuries. While 72% had received training courses in OSH. 70% of the total had attended only a small number of courses (one course). Respondents’ exposure to hazards during work ranged from moderate to high—57% and 43%. respectively. Regarding the OSH measures available in the work environment (as perceived by respondents). the most important were: provision of rest areas for researchers (the mean relative weight score = 2.89). followed by dedicated changing rooms (the mean relative weight = 2.63). Respondents’ use of OSH measures ranged from low to moderate (23% and 65%. respectively). Furthermore. 82% believed that OSH procedures and standards are applied to a moderate or low degree in the aquaculture field. The most prominent proposals to enhance OSH procedures and standards in aquaculture workplaces were: delivering training courses by OSH specialists (96%); distributing OSH guidance leaflets to researchers (91%); posting hazard-warning posters that explain risks and prevention methods (88%); preparing a report on every workplace incident (87%); and conducting routine inspection. maintenance. and cleaning of personal protective equipment after use (85%).The study primarily aimed to identify the occupational hazards facing researchers in the field of aquaculture sector by: profiling respondents’ general characteristics; determining their degree of exposure to hazards during work; identifying the occupational safety and health (OSH) measures available in their work environment and the extent to which respondents use them; assessing the application of OSH procedures and standards in the workplace; and compiling respondents’ suggestions for activating OSH standards in aquaculture settings. The research was conducted among researchers at the Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research (Abbassa). Sharkia Governorate. and covered 141 respondents. Data were collected through an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Frequencies. percentages. and the mean relative weight were used to rank statements by importance and to present the results.Key findings indicated that 52% of respondents had a high level of awareness of the concept of occupational hazards. and 60% had experienced work-related injuries. While 72% had received training courses in OSH. 70% of the total had attended only a small number of courses (one course). Respondents’ exposure to hazards during work ranged from moderate to high—57% and 43%. respectively. Regarding the OSH measures available in the work environment (as perceived by respondents). the most important were: provision of rest areas for researchers (the mean relative weight score = 2.89). followed by dedicated changing rooms (the mean relative weight = 2.63). Respondents’ use of OSH measures ranged from low to moderate (23% and 65%. respectively). Furthermore. 82% believed that OSH procedures and standards are applied to a moderate or low degree in the aquaculture field. The most prominent proposals to enhance OSH procedures and standards in aquaculture workplaces were: delivering training courses by OSH specialists (96%); distributing OSH guidance leaflets to researchers (91%); posting hazard-warning posters that explain risks and prevention methods (88%); preparing a report on every workplace incident (87%); and conducting routine inspection. maintenance. and cleaning of personal protective equipment after use (85%).

Alexandria Science Exchange JournalVol. 46(3)
Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.