Mapping the feedback landscape: a systematic review of research on feedback sources, methods, and technologies in preservice teacher education

Feedback is widely recognized as a cornerstone of effective teacher education that functions as a critical bridge between conceptual knowledge and instructional practice. In the context of preservice teacher education, feedback supports teacher candidates’ development of instructional competence by providing targeted suggestions for improvement. Although existing literature offers insight into various feedback practices, there remains a lack of holistic synthesis examining how feedback is sourced, delivered, and mediated through technology. This systematic literature review, guided by Hattie and Timperley’s (2007) Feedback Model, analyzed 45 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2014 and early 2025. Findings revealed that the most studied feedback type by source is instructor-provided feedback ( n = 25), followed by peer ( n = 8), mixed-source ( n = 8), and technology-only feedback ( n = 2) and that written feedback is the most studied feedback method. Although some studies employed advanced technologies such as video annotations, AI simulations, and real-time coaching tools, most of the reviewed studies did not report using any specific technology to support feedback. This finding suggests the field’s ongoing interest in studying relatively traditional feedback methods despite the potential of value of peer feedback and the availability of scalable, interactive, and cost-effective feedback technologies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1657737
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the feedback landscape: a systematic review of research on feedback sources, methods, and technologies in preservice teacher education

Michael Okumu, Catherine Lammert, Ceren Gokmen, Felix Mule
Frontiers in Education
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Mapping the feedback landscape: a systematic review of research on feedback sources, methods, and technologies in preservice teacher education

Michael Okumu, Catherine Lammert, Ceren Gokmen, Felix Mule
article en

Abstract

Feedback is widely recognized as a cornerstone of effective teacher education that functions as a critical bridge between conceptual knowledge and instructional practice. In the context of preservice teacher education, feedback supports teacher candidates’ development of instructional competence by providing targeted suggestions for improvement. Although existing literature offers insight into various feedback practices, there remains a lack of holistic synthesis examining how feedback is sourced, delivered, and mediated through technology. This systematic literature review, guided by Hattie and Timperley’s (2007) Feedback Model, analyzed 45 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2014 and early 2025. Findings revealed that the most studied feedback type by source is instructor-provided feedback ( n = 25), followed by peer ( n = 8), mixed-source ( n = 8), and technology-only feedback ( n = 2) and that written feedback is the most studied feedback method. Although some studies employed advanced technologies such as video annotations, AI simulations, and real-time coaching tools, most of the reviewed studies did not report using any specific technology to support feedback. This finding suggests the field’s ongoing interest in studying relatively traditional feedback methods despite the potential of value of peer feedback and the availability of scalable, interactive, and cost-effective feedback technologies.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.