PhotIQA: A photoacoustic image data set with image quality ratings

Image quality assessment (IQA) is crucial in the evaluation stage of novel algorithms operating on images, including traditional and machine learning based methods. Due to the lack of available quality-rated medical images, most commonly used full-reference IQA measures have been developed and tested for natural images. Reported pitfalls and inconsistencies arising when applying such measures for medical images are not surprising, as they rely on different properties than natural images. In photoacoustic imaging (PAI), especially, standard benchmarking approaches for assessing the quality of image reconstructions are lacking. PAI is a multi-physics imaging modality, in which two inverse problems have to be solved, which makes the application of IQA measures uniquely challenging due to both, acoustic and optical, artifacts. To support the development and testing of IQA measures we assembled PhotIQA, a data set consisting of 1134 photoacoustic images. The images were rated by five experts across five quality properties in a full-reference setting, where the detailed rating enables usage beyond PAI. The data set with the images and corresponding ratings is publicly available on Zenodo.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Data
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-07610-8
Primary Topic
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Type
preprint
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

PhotIQA: A photoacoustic image data set with image quality ratings

Carola‐Bibiane Schönlieb, Anna Breger, Thomas R. Else, Jonathan Richard Weir-McCall et al.
Scientific Data
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
preprint

PhotIQA: A photoacoustic image data set with image quality ratings

Carola‐Bibiane Schönlieb, Anna Breger, Thomas R. Else, Jonathan Richard Weir-McCall, Ian Selby, Janek Gröhl, Clemens Karner
preprint en

Abstract

Image quality assessment (IQA) is crucial in the evaluation stage of novel algorithms operating on images, including traditional and machine learning based methods. Due to the lack of available quality-rated medical images, most commonly used full-reference IQA measures have been developed and tested for natural images. Reported pitfalls and inconsistencies arising when applying such measures for medical images are not surprising, as they rely on different properties than natural images. In photoacoustic imaging (PAI), especially, standard benchmarking approaches for assessing the quality of image reconstructions are lacking. PAI is a multi-physics imaging modality, in which two inverse problems have to be solved, which makes the application of IQA measures uniquely challenging due to both, acoustic and optical, artifacts. To support the development and testing of IQA measures we assembled PhotIQA, a data set consisting of 1134 photoacoustic images. The images were rated by five experts across five quality properties in a full-reference setting, where the detailed rating enables usage beyond PAI. The data set with the images and corresponding ratings is publicly available on Zenodo.

Scientific Data
German Cancer Research Center (DE), King's College London (GB), Heidelberg University (DE), University of Cambridge (GB), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Cancer Research UK Cambridge Center (GB), Bridge University (SS), Cambridge University Press (GB), Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine (DE), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Leverhulme Trust, Department of Health and Social Care, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Austrian Science Fund, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.