How Environmental Regulations Influence <scp>ESG</scp> Controversies: The Role of Climate Governance and Environmental Decoupling

ABSTRACT This study examines how environmental regulations influence ESG controversies, with climate governance as a moderating factor and environmental decoupling as a mediating mechanism. Using 5110 firm‐year observations from European‐listed firms in the STOXX Europe 600 index between 2010 and 2024, our analyses yield three main findings. First, stringent environmental regulations significantly reduce ESG controversies by increasing compliance pressure, discouraging violations, and mitigating stakeholder skepticism. Second, environmental regulations reduce environmental decoupling, which in turn influences the extent of ESG controversies. This indicates that environmental decoupling mediates the relationship between environmental regulation and controversies, as firms may use it to obscure gaps between reported and actual performance, lowering external scrutiny. Finally, strong climate governance supports regulatory compliance, mitigates ESG controversies, and provides safeguards during adverse events. Robustness checks confirm the stability of the results. These findings offer practical implications for scholars, policymakers, and regulators aiming to strengthen corporate accountability and transparency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2025-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70235
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Environmental Regulations Influence ESG Controversies: The Role of Climate Governance and Environmental Decoupling

Hussain Muhammad, Mohamed Aman
4 citations
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Climate Change Policy and Economics
12.52
article

How Environmental Regulations Influence ESG Controversies: The Role of Climate Governance and Environmental Decoupling

Hussain Muhammad, Mohamed Aman
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines how environmental regulations influence ESG controversies, with climate governance as a moderating factor and environmental decoupling as a mediating mechanism. Using 5110 firm‐year observations from European‐listed firms in the STOXX Europe 600 index between 2010 and 2024, our analyses yield three main findings. First, stringent environmental regulations significantly reduce ESG controversies by increasing compliance pressure, discouraging violations, and mitigating stakeholder skepticism. Second, environmental regulations reduce environmental decoupling, which in turn influences the extent of ESG controversies. This indicates that environmental decoupling mediates the relationship between environmental regulation and controversies, as firms may use it to obscure gaps between reported and actual performance, lowering external scrutiny. Finally, strong climate governance supports regulatory compliance, mitigates ESG controversies, and provides safeguards during adverse events. Robustness checks confirm the stability of the results. These findings offer practical implications for scholars, policymakers, and regulators aiming to strengthen corporate accountability and transparency.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental ManagementVol. 33(1)
University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), American University of Ras Al Khaimah (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
12.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.