Funding Trends and Gender Disparities in Tanzanian Biomedical Research: Insights From Global Health Funding Databases

Background Research funding is crucial for advancing scientific knowledge and innovation. Understanding patterns and trends in research funding, including potential gender disparities, can provide valuable insights for policymakers, funding agencies, and researchers. This study aimed to analyze the distribution of research funding in Tanzania, identify major contributors, uncover trends over the past years, and examine gender disparities among principal investigators (PIs). Methods Data from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding database and World RePORT were utilized. Data cleaning and preprocessing ensured consistency and accuracy, with funding amounts converted to common currency (USD) for analysis. Statistical and trend analyses were performed to identify key patterns, focusing on funding distribution by research organization, funding organization, fiscal year, type of record, and PI gender. Results A total of $218,409,329 were distributed across 438 projects led by 324 unique PIs. Male PIs accounted for 228 (70.4%), females for 91 (28.1%), and five (1.5%) were of unspecified gender. Collaborative projects comprised 374 entries ($158,121,528.60), and direct funding accounted for 64 projects ($60,287,799.96). The European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership contributed the most ($165,598,586; 75.8%), followed by the Wellcome Trust ($12,282,858; 5.6%) and the European Commission ($12,017,629; 5.5%). Funding rose steadily, peaking in 2020 and 2022 at over US $40 million. The National Institute for Medical Research received the highest total cost (US$95,453,357; 43.7%). Male PIs led more projects and received $49,038,802, compared to $22,475,127 for female PIs. In 2023, however, female PIs received more funding ($5,517,171) than male PIs ($4,354,089), reversing previous trends. Conclusions Research funding in Tanzania remains concentrated among a few institutions and is dominated by one major donor. Although overall funding has increased, significant gender disparities persist. The 2023 shift toward greater female PI funding is promising but requires sustained policy attention. These insights can inform equitable research and investment strategies for Tanzania.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.94912
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Funding Trends and Gender Disparities in Tanzanian Biomedical Research: Insights From Global Health Funding Databases

Upendo Masamu, Bruno P. Mmbando, Siana Watoky Nkya, Raphael Zozimus Sangeda et al.
1 citations
Cureus
Diversity and Career in Medicine
3.87
article

Funding Trends and Gender Disparities in Tanzanian Biomedical Research: Insights From Global Health Funding Databases

Upendo Masamu, Bruno P. Mmbando, Siana Watoky Nkya, Raphael Zozimus Sangeda, Rehema C Mallya, Magdalena Lyimo, Nahya Salim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Research funding is crucial for advancing scientific knowledge and innovation. Understanding patterns and trends in research funding, including potential gender disparities, can provide valuable insights for policymakers, funding agencies, and researchers. This study aimed to analyze the distribution of research funding in Tanzania, identify major contributors, uncover trends over the past years, and examine gender disparities among principal investigators (PIs). Methods Data from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding database and World RePORT were utilized. Data cleaning and preprocessing ensured consistency and accuracy, with funding amounts converted to common currency (USD) for analysis. Statistical and trend analyses were performed to identify key patterns, focusing on funding distribution by research organization, funding organization, fiscal year, type of record, and PI gender. Results A total of $218,409,329 were distributed across 438 projects led by 324 unique PIs. Male PIs accounted for 228 (70.4%), females for 91 (28.1%), and five (1.5%) were of unspecified gender. Collaborative projects comprised 374 entries ($158,121,528.60), and direct funding accounted for 64 projects ($60,287,799.96). The European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership contributed the most ($165,598,586; 75.8%), followed by the Wellcome Trust ($12,282,858; 5.6%) and the European Commission ($12,017,629; 5.5%). Funding rose steadily, peaking in 2020 and 2022 at over US $40 million. The National Institute for Medical Research received the highest total cost (US$95,453,357; 43.7%). Male PIs led more projects and received $49,038,802, compared to $22,475,127 for female PIs. In 2023, however, female PIs received more funding ($5,517,171) than male PIs ($4,354,089), reversing previous trends. Conclusions Research funding in Tanzania remains concentrated among a few institutions and is dominated by one major donor. Although overall funding has increased, significant gender disparities persist. The 2023 shift toward greater female PI funding is promising but requires sustained policy attention. These insights can inform equitable research and investment strategies for Tanzania.

CureusVol. 17(10)
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ), National Institute for Medical Research (TZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.