Mitigating or magnifying systemic risk? The role of non-interest income during market disruptions

• In a pandemic-led liquidity crisis, banks diversify risk via non-interest activities. • In war-driven sector-specific shock, relying on non-interest income heightens risk. • Trading revenue impacts bank risks during these market disruptions. • Lower risk exposure in non-interest revenue streams enhances profitability in crises. We examine how non-interest income affects U.S. banks' systemic risk during financial disruptions. Using quarterly data from 2010–2023 and marginal expected shortfall as our risk measure, we find that non-interest income reduces systemic risk during the market-wide liquidity crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, but increases risk during the Russia-Ukraine conflict, a sector-specific disruption. Trading income, rather than fee-based income, drives these effects. Our findings suggest banks strategically employ non-interest activities for risk diversification during broad liquidity crises, with implications for calibrating regulatory oversight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance research letters
Published
2025-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108737
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating or magnifying systemic risk? The role of non-interest income during market disruptions

Ralf Zurbruegg, Md Abdul Wasi
Finance research letters
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Mitigating or magnifying systemic risk? The role of non-interest income during market disruptions

Ralf Zurbruegg, Md Abdul Wasi
article en

Abstract

• In a pandemic-led liquidity crisis, banks diversify risk via non-interest activities. • In war-driven sector-specific shock, relying on non-interest income heightens risk. • Trading revenue impacts bank risks during these market disruptions. • Lower risk exposure in non-interest revenue streams enhances profitability in crises. We examine how non-interest income affects U.S. banks' systemic risk during financial disruptions. Using quarterly data from 2010–2023 and marginal expected shortfall as our risk measure, we find that non-interest income reduces systemic risk during the market-wide liquidity crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, but increases risk during the Russia-Ukraine conflict, a sector-specific disruption. Trading income, rather than fee-based income, drives these effects. Our findings suggest banks strategically employ non-interest activities for risk diversification during broad liquidity crises, with implications for calibrating regulatory oversight.

Finance research lettersVol. 86
La Trobe University (AU), Department of Finance (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mitigating or magnifying systemic risk? The role of non-interest income during market disruptions — Ralf Zurbruegg, Md Abdul Wasi · Finance research letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS