The development of students’ thinking skills: Perspectives from higher education instructors in Japan, Europe, and Australia

• Examined higher education instructors’ views about the thinking skills they consider important for their students to develop. • A qualitative survey was conducted of higher education instructors in Japan, Europe, and Australia. • Both similarities and differences between countries/region were found in what the instructors considered important. • Good alignment was also found between skills and learning objectives set, and between teaching and assessment practices described and thinking skills considered important. • However, it was not always clear what aspects of the skills might be facilitated by the practices. • Many of the instructors also reported some difficulties in fitting thinking skills promotion in their courses. • Findings can usefully inform efforts at facilitating greater effectiveness in promoting thinking skills development in higher education. The development of students’ thinking skills, considered indispensable in 21st Century education, relies considerably on the beliefs and teaching practices of their instructors. While a lot has been written by educational researchers on the topic of “teaching thinking”, relatively little has been reported on higher education instructors’ own views and conceptions, priorities, and practices regarding the broad set of thinking skills that they may consider important for their students to develop. In this research therefore, we attempted to address this gap by conducting a qualitative survey of higher education instructors in Japan, Europe, and Australia. Ninety-nine instructors voluntarily completed our survey. We found both similarities and differences between countries/region in what the instructors considered important. Such differences may arise from country/regional variations in educational and societal views. We also found good alignment between skills and the learning objectives the instructors reported setting, and between the teaching and assessment practices they described and the thinking skills they considered important. However, it was not always clear what aspects of the skills might be facilitated by the practices. Furthermore, many of the instructors indicated some difficulties in fitting thinking skills promotion in their courses. Insights we gain from this study can usefully inform efforts at facilitating greater effectiveness in promoting thinking skills development in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Published
2025-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102028
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The development of students’ thinking skills: Perspectives from higher education instructors in Japan, Europe, and Australia

Maribel Blasco, Emmanuel Manalo, Rachel Dryer, Natalia Suárez Fernández et al.
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

The development of students’ thinking skills: Perspectives from higher education instructors in Japan, Europe, and Australia

Maribel Blasco, Emmanuel Manalo, Rachel Dryer, Natalia Suárez Fernández, Rebeca Cerezo, Ayano Tsuda, Tamim Elbasha, Rei Hirayama
article en

Abstract

• Examined higher education instructors’ views about the thinking skills they consider important for their students to develop. • A qualitative survey was conducted of higher education instructors in Japan, Europe, and Australia. • Both similarities and differences between countries/region were found in what the instructors considered important. • Good alignment was also found between skills and learning objectives set, and between teaching and assessment practices described and thinking skills considered important. • However, it was not always clear what aspects of the skills might be facilitated by the practices. • Many of the instructors also reported some difficulties in fitting thinking skills promotion in their courses. • Findings can usefully inform efforts at facilitating greater effectiveness in promoting thinking skills development in higher education. The development of students’ thinking skills, considered indispensable in 21st Century education, relies considerably on the beliefs and teaching practices of their instructors. While a lot has been written by educational researchers on the topic of “teaching thinking”, relatively little has been reported on higher education instructors’ own views and conceptions, priorities, and practices regarding the broad set of thinking skills that they may consider important for their students to develop. In this research therefore, we attempted to address this gap by conducting a qualitative survey of higher education instructors in Japan, Europe, and Australia. Ninety-nine instructors voluntarily completed our survey. We found both similarities and differences between countries/region in what the instructors considered important. Such differences may arise from country/regional variations in educational and societal views. We also found good alignment between skills and the learning objectives the instructors reported setting, and between the teaching and assessment practices they described and the thinking skills they considered important. However, it was not always clear what aspects of the skills might be facilitated by the practices. Furthermore, many of the instructors indicated some difficulties in fitting thinking skills promotion in their courses. Insights we gain from this study can usefully inform efforts at facilitating greater effectiveness in promoting thinking skills development in higher education.

Thinking Skills and CreativityVol. 60
Audencia Business School (FR), Universidad de Oviedo (ES), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Yamanashi Gakuin University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.