Molecular Simulation of Functionalized Covalent Organic Framework Membranes for Inorganic Salt Separation
Abstract Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) enable molecular‐level design of nanochannels for selective separation in pressure‐driven membrane processes. Through variation of building blocks and, subsequently, the pore structure and chemistry, membrane performance can be tailored. This study employs nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations to theoretically demonstrate the tunable selectivity of COF membranes through a bottom‐up functionalization approach. Water and salt transport are evaluated for six β‐ketoenamine‐linked COFs with varying multilayer thicknesses. For the thinnest multilayer (0.64–0.72 nm), all COFs exhibit low sodium sulfate (Na 2 SO 4 ) rejection (55–66%). However, 20 stacked sheets (6.4–7.2 nm) provide 67–98% rejection, with the sulfonated COF providing the highest Na 2 SO 4 rejection. Analysis of time‐resolved ion density profiles reveals that solute rejection is primarily governed by interfacial exclusion arising from pore size and functional group chemistry. Although increasing salt rejection compromises water permeance, the permeance of all COF membranes is at least two orders of magnitude greater than that of a commercially available nanofiltration membrane. Overall, this work guides the rational design of COF membranes for aqueous salt separation.
Authors
- Ganesh Sivaraman
- Anand Narayanan Krishnamoorthy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1584-7146)
- Lauren Valentino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6259-0304)
- Grace Wei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4211-1927)
Institutions
- Argonne National Laboratory (US)
- Shell (India) (IN)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Advanced Theory and Simulations
- Published
- 2025-10-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202501576
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Covalent Organic Framework Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.04
Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Office of Science
- Laboratory Directed Research and Development
- Argonne National Laboratory