AI legitimacy in energy: A model to improve corporate narratives on sustainability and responsibility

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the energy sector is pivotal for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7). Within the European Union, the regulatory landscape, particularly the proposed AI Act, influences how organisations navigate responsible AI (RAI) adoption while addressing societal expectations, creating a critical need to examine how they communicate their commitment to RAI and sustainability. This study uncovers how narratives employed in the public communications of EU energy stakeholders legitimise corporate efforts and signal alignment with RAI principles. A grey literature search of website pages, whitepapers, and reports was conducted. Thematic analysis, using inductive and deductive coding, was employed to identify emerging themes and evaluate how organisations frame their initiatives in response to regulatory and societal pressures. Analysis of 28 reports reveals that EU energy stakeholders predominantly frame AI as an inevitable technological advancement while lacking concrete strategies for RAI implementation. Communications focus on aspirational commitments rather than measurable actions. To address these gaps, this study develops the Responsible AI (RAI) Communication Model. This framework guides stakeholders in structuring their communication around three core pillars: (1) aligning AI initiatives with measurable sustainability goals and governance, (2) developing trustworthy and accountable narratives backed by concrete evidence, and (3) establishing organisational legitimacy through active stakeholder engagement. By adopting this model, energy stakeholders can move beyond rhetorical narratives towards sharing demonstrable practices. This fosters greater trust, ensures effective communication of priorities like transparency and accountability, and promotes regulatory alignment. • Energy stakeholders view AI as essential for sustainable transitions. • Technological innovation is leveraged as an organisational legitimacy tool. • A critical gap exists between AI ambitions and practical responsible AI measures. • A model is developed to guide communication of AI strategies in energy. • Roadmaps needed to establish accountability and compliance mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124378
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI legitimacy in energy: A model to improve corporate narratives on sustainability and responsibility

Haider Al‐Khateeb, Laura Di Chiacchio, Usman Butt, Salman Yussof
2 citations
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
8.40
article

AI legitimacy in energy: A model to improve corporate narratives on sustainability and responsibility

Haider Al‐Khateeb, Laura Di Chiacchio, Usman Butt, Salman Yussof
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the energy sector is pivotal for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7). Within the European Union, the regulatory landscape, particularly the proposed AI Act, influences how organisations navigate responsible AI (RAI) adoption while addressing societal expectations, creating a critical need to examine how they communicate their commitment to RAI and sustainability. This study uncovers how narratives employed in the public communications of EU energy stakeholders legitimise corporate efforts and signal alignment with RAI principles. A grey literature search of website pages, whitepapers, and reports was conducted. Thematic analysis, using inductive and deductive coding, was employed to identify emerging themes and evaluate how organisations frame their initiatives in response to regulatory and societal pressures. Analysis of 28 reports reveals that EU energy stakeholders predominantly frame AI as an inevitable technological advancement while lacking concrete strategies for RAI implementation. Communications focus on aspirational commitments rather than measurable actions. To address these gaps, this study develops the Responsible AI (RAI) Communication Model. This framework guides stakeholders in structuring their communication around three core pillars: (1) aligning AI initiatives with measurable sustainability goals and governance, (2) developing trustworthy and accountable narratives backed by concrete evidence, and (3) establishing organisational legitimacy through active stakeholder engagement. By adopting this model, energy stakeholders can move beyond rhetorical narratives towards sharing demonstrable practices. This fosters greater trust, ensures effective communication of priorities like transparency and accountability, and promotes regulatory alignment. • Energy stakeholders view AI as essential for sustainable transitions. • Technological innovation is leveraged as an organisational legitimacy tool. • A critical gap exists between AI ambitions and practical responsible AI measures. • A model is developed to guide communication of AI strategies in energy. • Roadmaps needed to establish accountability and compliance mechanisms.

Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeVol. 222
Aston University (GB), Ajman University (AE), Universiti Tenaga Nasional (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.