Variable-based probabilistic calibration with binary outcome

In developing risk prediction models for specific diseases, it is essential to evaluate the calibration performance of the prediction model. Various methods have been proposed to assess the calibration of prediction models, but it has been pointed out that conventional methods based on the predicted probability of the model are insufficient to detect miscalibration. Another problem is that a method for evaluating calibration for continuous variables of interest has not yet been established. We therefore propose two methods to evaluate the calibration of the variable of interest: the variable-based probabilistic calibration plot (VPC-Plot), which is a visual assessment, and the variable-based probabilistic calibration error (VPCE), which is a corresponding evaluation metric. We conducted theoretical and simulation studies to investigate the properties and effectiveness of the proposed method. Theoretical and simulation studies demonstrated that the proposed methods can detect miscalibration by evaluating the calibration based on the variable of interest, even when conventional methods fail to detect miscalibration. To show the usefulness in the real-world data analysis, we evaluated diabetes prediction models developed using the national health insurance database for Osaka, Japan. We show that the proposed method can identify miscalibration of key covariate in a diabetes prediction model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biostatistics
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaf026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variable-based probabilistic calibration with binary outcome

Asuka Oyama, Hiroe Seto, Shuji Kitora, Ryohei Yamamoto et al.
1 citations
Biostatistics
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
0.71
article

Variable-based probabilistic calibration with binary outcome

Asuka Oyama, Hiroe Seto, Shuji Kitora, Ryohei Yamamoto, Michio Yamamoto, H. Toki
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In developing risk prediction models for specific diseases, it is essential to evaluate the calibration performance of the prediction model. Various methods have been proposed to assess the calibration of prediction models, but it has been pointed out that conventional methods based on the predicted probability of the model are insufficient to detect miscalibration. Another problem is that a method for evaluating calibration for continuous variables of interest has not yet been established. We therefore propose two methods to evaluate the calibration of the variable of interest: the variable-based probabilistic calibration plot (VPC-Plot), which is a visual assessment, and the variable-based probabilistic calibration error (VPCE), which is a corresponding evaluation metric. We conducted theoretical and simulation studies to investigate the properties and effectiveness of the proposed method. Theoretical and simulation studies demonstrated that the proposed methods can detect miscalibration by evaluating the calibration based on the variable of interest, even when conventional methods fail to detect miscalibration. To show the usefulness in the real-world data analysis, we evaluated diabetes prediction models developed using the national health insurance database for Osaka, Japan. We show that the proposed method can identify miscalibration of key covariate in a diabetes prediction model.

BiostatisticsVol. 26(1)
Osaka University of Human Sciences (JP), Toneyama National Hospital (JP), RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project (JP), Health Promotion Services (US), The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.