Mentor or Examiner? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Ai-Generated Feedback in EFL Writing Education

This study addresses a critical gap in understanding how artificial intelligence (AI) systems construct evaluative discourse in language education contexts.While AI-powered feedback tools increasingly supplement or replace human assessment in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing instruction, limited attention has been paid to the discursive mechanisms through which these systems position learners, construct authority, and shape pedagogical relationships.Drawing on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), this article develops a comprehensive framework for analyzing AI feedback discourse through a comparative analysis of two Large Language Models' (LLMs') responses to 63 undergraduate EFL descriptive essays.Employing Fairclough's three-dimensional CDA framework, the analysis reveals distinct patterns in how AI systems construct their evaluative stance, distribute agency, and enact pedagogical authority in feedback.An emergent six-part taxonomy of discourse moves is identified: diagnostic positioning, prescriptive directives, facilitative suggestions, affective engagement, metalinguistic explanation, and comparative benchmarking.Findings indicate that the two LLMs employ contrasting discursive strategiesakin to a mentor versus an examiner-with significant implications for student positioning, learning autonomy, and the nature of pedagogical relationships in digitally mediated contexts.The proposed framework extends CDA methodology to AI-generated educational discourse and offers educators practical tools for critically evaluating AI feedback systems.As educational institutions rapidly adopt AI assessment tools, this taxonomy enables informed decisions about which discursive practices align with desired pedagogical values.The study concludes by discussing implications for student agency, pedagogical authority, and AI literacy in teacher education, and by recommending the development of more pedagogically-aligned AI feedback systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Published
2025-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v14-i4/26651
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mentor or Examiner? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Ai-Generated Feedback in EFL Writing Education

Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh, Tee Tze Kiong, Tarsame Singh Masa Singh, Liang Ting et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.44
article

Mentor or Examiner? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Ai-Generated Feedback in EFL Writing Education

Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh, Tee Tze Kiong, Tarsame Singh Masa Singh, Liang Ting, Farkhodjon Rakhimjonov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study addresses a critical gap in understanding how artificial intelligence (AI) systems construct evaluative discourse in language education contexts.While AI-powered feedback tools increasingly supplement or replace human assessment in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing instruction, limited attention has been paid to the discursive mechanisms through which these systems position learners, construct authority, and shape pedagogical relationships.Drawing on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), this article develops a comprehensive framework for analyzing AI feedback discourse through a comparative analysis of two Large Language Models' (LLMs') responses to 63 undergraduate EFL descriptive essays.Employing Fairclough's three-dimensional CDA framework, the analysis reveals distinct patterns in how AI systems construct their evaluative stance, distribute agency, and enact pedagogical authority in feedback.An emergent six-part taxonomy of discourse moves is identified: diagnostic positioning, prescriptive directives, facilitative suggestions, affective engagement, metalinguistic explanation, and comparative benchmarking.Findings indicate that the two LLMs employ contrasting discursive strategiesakin to a mentor versus an examiner-with significant implications for student positioning, learning autonomy, and the nature of pedagogical relationships in digitally mediated contexts.The proposed framework extends CDA methodology to AI-generated educational discourse and offers educators practical tools for critically evaluating AI feedback systems.As educational institutions rapidly adopt AI assessment tools, this taxonomy enables informed decisions about which discursive practices align with desired pedagogical values.The study concludes by discussing implications for student agency, pedagogical authority, and AI literacy in teacher education, and by recommending the development of more pedagogically-aligned AI feedback systems.

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and DevelopmentVol. 14(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.