Till We Meet Again: Towards an Affective Sociology of Schedules

Drawing from studies of affect, this article explores how affect theory can inform how we theorise schedules. The notion of the schedule, of great interest to sociologists, has mostly been explored from a constructionist approach. The current article extends these readings, proposing the concepts of ‘scheduling in motion’ and ‘affective scheduling’, through which scheduling is explored as a relational and affective process. In doing so, it positions affective scheduling as a mode of inquiry that embraces the multiplicity and fragmentation of lived time. From this vantage point, I highlight how scheduling is felt, sensed and materialised in ways that bypass realms of demarcated temporal patterns. Important in this respect is the understanding that scheduling is a grouping together of heterogeneous elements, emerging in moments of encounters between bodies. This study is a first step to addressing the potential of affective scheduling in exploring everyday lived experiences, temporality and affection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251376223
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Till We Meet Again: Towards an Affective Sociology of Schedules

Kinneret Lahad
Sociology
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Till We Meet Again: Towards an Affective Sociology of Schedules

Kinneret Lahad
article en

Abstract

Drawing from studies of affect, this article explores how affect theory can inform how we theorise schedules. The notion of the schedule, of great interest to sociologists, has mostly been explored from a constructionist approach. The current article extends these readings, proposing the concepts of ‘scheduling in motion’ and ‘affective scheduling’, through which scheduling is explored as a relational and affective process. In doing so, it positions affective scheduling as a mode of inquiry that embraces the multiplicity and fragmentation of lived time. From this vantage point, I highlight how scheduling is felt, sensed and materialised in ways that bypass realms of demarcated temporal patterns. Important in this respect is the understanding that scheduling is a grouping together of heterogeneous elements, emerging in moments of encounters between bodies. This study is a first step to addressing the potential of affective scheduling in exploring everyday lived experiences, temporality and affection.

Sociology
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.