Revisiting employment standards: Informalized formal job and bogus partnership in platform courier work

Digital platforms have fundamentally reshaped labor relations across various sectors, including courier services in Indonesia. This study examines how both formal (standard employment) and non-standard (informal employment) models contribute to what we term “super-exploitation.” On one hand, workers nominally classified as employees do not receive adequate protection despite their formal status (informalized formal work), while on the other hand, workers designated as “partners” or independent contractors face similarly precarious conditions (bogus partnership). By integrating a political economy perspective, this research reveals that the mere reclassification of labor from formal to informal conceals the reality that labels do not automatically translate into improved working conditions. Data were collected through a qualitative approach involving a survey of 270 couriers, 24 in-depth interviews, and online participant observation conducted between July 2022 and July 2023. The findings contribute to the ongoing debate on precarious work by demonstrating that the conventional dichotomy of formal versus informal employment fails to capture the underlying ideological and political economic forces shaping Indonesia’s labor regime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205251377006
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting employment standards: Informalized formal job and bogus partnership in platform courier work

Arif Novianto
Critical Sociology
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Revisiting employment standards: Informalized formal job and bogus partnership in platform courier work

Arif Novianto
article en

Abstract

Digital platforms have fundamentally reshaped labor relations across various sectors, including courier services in Indonesia. This study examines how both formal (standard employment) and non-standard (informal employment) models contribute to what we term “super-exploitation.” On one hand, workers nominally classified as employees do not receive adequate protection despite their formal status (informalized formal work), while on the other hand, workers designated as “partners” or independent contractors face similarly precarious conditions (bogus partnership). By integrating a political economy perspective, this research reveals that the mere reclassification of labor from formal to informal conceals the reality that labels do not automatically translate into improved working conditions. Data were collected through a qualitative approach involving a survey of 270 couriers, 24 in-depth interviews, and online participant observation conducted between July 2022 and July 2023. The findings contribute to the ongoing debate on precarious work by demonstrating that the conventional dichotomy of formal versus informal employment fails to capture the underlying ideological and political economic forces shaping Indonesia’s labor regime.

Critical Sociology
Universitas Tidar (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting employment standards: Informalized formal job and bogus partnership in platform courier work — Arif Novianto · Critical Sociology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS