Effective interface forces to model boundary effects in a finite-size metamaterial through the reduced relaxed micromorphic model

We use the reduced relaxed micromorphic model (RRMM) to capture the effective “bulk” dynamical response of finite-size metamaterial specimens made out of a Labyrinthine unit cell. We show that for small finite-size specimens, boundary effects can play a major role, so that the RRMM needs an enrichment to capture the metamaterial’s bulk response, as well as the boundary effects. A benchmark test is introduced to show that different metamaterial/ homogeneous material interfaces can drive completely different responses even if the bulk metamaterial remains the same. We show with no remaining doubts that the concept of “interface forces” must necessarily be introduced if one wants to model finite-size metamaterials in a homogenized framework. AMS 2010 subject classification: 74A10, 74B05, 74J05, 74M25

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10812865251358258
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Numerical methods in engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effective interface forces to model boundary effects in a finite-size metamaterial through the reduced relaxed micromorphic model

Angela Madeo, Jendrik Voss, Plastiras Demetriou
1 citations
Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids
Numerical methods in engineering
0.86
article

Effective interface forces to model boundary effects in a finite-size metamaterial through the reduced relaxed micromorphic model

Angela Madeo, Jendrik Voss, Plastiras Demetriou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We use the reduced relaxed micromorphic model (RRMM) to capture the effective “bulk” dynamical response of finite-size metamaterial specimens made out of a Labyrinthine unit cell. We show that for small finite-size specimens, boundary effects can play a major role, so that the RRMM needs an enrichment to capture the metamaterial’s bulk response, as well as the boundary effects. A benchmark test is introduced to show that different metamaterial/ homogeneous material interfaces can drive completely different responses even if the bulk metamaterial remains the same. We show with no remaining doubts that the concept of “interface forces” must necessarily be introduced if one wants to model finite-size metamaterials in a homogenized framework. AMS 2010 subject classification: 74A10, 74B05, 74J05, 74M25

Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids
TU Dortmund University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Numerical methods in engineering
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.