Governing mental health: A Foucauldian discourse analysis of power, media and ideology in British newspapers

This article examines how mental health is discursively constructed in British newspapers. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s concepts of power, discourse and biopolitics, the study employs Foucauldian discourse analysis to explore how mental illness is framed across newspapers with different political ideologies. By comparing left- and right-leaning newspapers, our research identifies how these political ideologies shape narratives of mental health, revealing how these representations contribute to normalization, pathologization or politicization of mental distress. The findings suggest that media discourse functions not merely as a reflection of public sentiment, but as a mechanism through which mental health is governed; structuring what is thinkable, sayable and actionable. In doing so, the study can deepen critical insights into how media contributes to the creation of mental health knowledge and highlights the subtle operations of power that underpin everyday representations of illness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
News Research Journal
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30497841251380189
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing mental health: A Foucauldian discourse analysis of power, media and ideology in British newspapers

Muhammad Asim Imran, Zehra Ahmed
News Research Journal
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Governing mental health: A Foucauldian discourse analysis of power, media and ideology in British newspapers

Muhammad Asim Imran, Zehra Ahmed
article en

Abstract

This article examines how mental health is discursively constructed in British newspapers. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s concepts of power, discourse and biopolitics, the study employs Foucauldian discourse analysis to explore how mental illness is framed across newspapers with different political ideologies. By comparing left- and right-leaning newspapers, our research identifies how these political ideologies shape narratives of mental health, revealing how these representations contribute to normalization, pathologization or politicization of mental distress. The findings suggest that media discourse functions not merely as a reflection of public sentiment, but as a mechanism through which mental health is governed; structuring what is thinkable, sayable and actionable. In doing so, the study can deepen critical insights into how media contributes to the creation of mental health knowledge and highlights the subtle operations of power that underpin everyday representations of illness.

News Research JournalVol. 46(4)
University of the Sciences (US), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Governing mental health: A Foucauldian discourse analysis of power, media and ideology in British newspapers — Muhammad Asim Imran, Zehra Ahmed · News Research Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS