The equalization of capital profitability through financial investments and the historical development of capitalism: Does Blackrock have the solution to the transformation problem?

The ‘equalization of firms' and sectoral profitability is considered a key feature of capitalist economy by most economic schools. For Marx, it is the basis of the laws of movement of bourgeois society. In this work we consider the related theoretical and empirical literature spanning for more than a century. We suggest that Marx exposed two different meanings of the process: the equalization in the productive sphere is a heritage of the classical school, in line with the Ricardian outlook of a capitalism with no endogenous crisis and no structural changes; the second is the equalization of capitals’ profitability as financial investment, that represents the historical development of capitalism and highlights the coming of age of finance capital and is the backbone of financialization, the dominant trend in contemporary capitalism. We conclude that this dimension of the equalization does not obliterate the laws of movement of capitalism and puts the discussion of the transformation problem on totally different terms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Capital & Class
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168251384285
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The equalization of capital profitability through financial investments and the historical development of capitalism: Does Blackrock have the solution to the transformation problem?

Lorenzo Esposito
Capital & Class
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

The equalization of capital profitability through financial investments and the historical development of capitalism: Does Blackrock have the solution to the transformation problem?

Lorenzo Esposito
article en

Abstract

The ‘equalization of firms' and sectoral profitability is considered a key feature of capitalist economy by most economic schools. For Marx, it is the basis of the laws of movement of bourgeois society. In this work we consider the related theoretical and empirical literature spanning for more than a century. We suggest that Marx exposed two different meanings of the process: the equalization in the productive sphere is a heritage of the classical school, in line with the Ricardian outlook of a capitalism with no endogenous crisis and no structural changes; the second is the equalization of capitals’ profitability as financial investment, that represents the historical development of capitalism and highlights the coming of age of finance capital and is the backbone of financialization, the dominant trend in contemporary capitalism. We conclude that this dimension of the equalization does not obliterate the laws of movement of capitalism and puts the discussion of the transformation problem on totally different terms.

Capital & Class
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The equalization of capital profitability through financial investments and the historical development of capitalism: Does Blackrock have the solution to the transformation problem? — Lorenzo Esposito · Capital & Class (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS