For a Strabismic Sociology: A View from the Southern Cone

This article, adapted from the 19th Lewis A. Coser lecture delivered in 2024 at the American Sociological Association Meetings, presents three intertwined and sometimes overlapping arguments. First, I examine the limitations of the category “Global South” for studying Latin America. Second, I develop this critique by proposing a perspective distinct from both Northern theory and Global South approaches—what I call a “strabismic” standpoint. Third, I demonstrate this perspective in situ through the case of Argentine sociology, tracing the circulation of knowledge from an intermediate field of sociological production, where the center–periphery duality is but one among multiple relevant dimensions. Taken together, I aim to provincialize current constructions of Global South theory and highlight how in their effort to develop new critiques of the existing canon, scholars—given the dominance of English as a lingua franca—may inadvertently reproduce the very ethnocentrism they seek to challenge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Theory
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751251382141
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

For a Strabismic Sociology: A View from the Southern Cone

Claudio E. Benzecry
1 citations
Sociological Theory
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
4.20
article

For a Strabismic Sociology: A View from the Southern Cone

Claudio E. Benzecry
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article, adapted from the 19th Lewis A. Coser lecture delivered in 2024 at the American Sociological Association Meetings, presents three intertwined and sometimes overlapping arguments. First, I examine the limitations of the category “Global South” for studying Latin America. Second, I develop this critique by proposing a perspective distinct from both Northern theory and Global South approaches—what I call a “strabismic” standpoint. Third, I demonstrate this perspective in situ through the case of Argentine sociology, tracing the circulation of knowledge from an intermediate field of sociological production, where the center–periphery duality is but one among multiple relevant dimensions. Taken together, I aim to provincialize current constructions of Global South theory and highlight how in their effort to develop new critiques of the existing canon, scholars—given the dominance of English as a lingua franca—may inadvertently reproduce the very ethnocentrism they seek to challenge.

Sociological TheoryVol. 43(4)
Northwestern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.