“I don’t believe that you believe what I believe”: an experiment on misperceptions of social norms and whistleblowing

Social norms shape economic decision-making, yet individuals often systematically misperceive what others think and do, potentially leading to suboptimal social outcomes. While existing research has demonstrated the prevalence and consequences of norm misperceptions across various domains, the literature has remained surprisingly silent on norm-enforcing behaviours. Despite their important role in providing collective benefits, these behaviours are regularly avoided because they may be viewed ambivalently by peers and create personal costs and interpersonal conflict for the actor. Using whistleblowing as an example of a broader category of regulatory behaviour, we examine whether i) norm misperceptions inhibit enforcement actions in the form of whistleblowing, and ii) norm-based interventions can effectively induce a behavioural change in this challenging domain. Through survey data and an incentivised laboratory experiment, we demonstrate that while a majority of individuals (77.55 %) privately support whistleblowing, almost half (45.92 %) misperceive the majority's view. This misperception has significant behavioural consequences: even when individuals personally support whistleblowing, their likelihood of reporting decreases by more than 30 % when normative expectations are perceived to favour silence rather than reporting. A social information intervention revealing the distribution of peer support shows only modest effectiveness. While it marginally increases whistleblowing among those already personally favouring reporting, it does not affect those who personally oppose whistleblowing. Our findings demonstrate the boundaries of norm interventions in enforcement contexts and suggest that, specifically for whistleblowing, corrections of norm misperceptions should not be viewed as substitutes for conventional approaches, such as financial incentives or whistleblower protection, in promoting whistleblowing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Economic Review
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105189
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I don’t believe that you believe what I believe”: an experiment on misperceptions of social norms and whistleblowing

Behnud Mir Djawadi, Sabrina Plaß, Sabrina Loer
European Economic Review
Ethics in Business and Education
article

“I don’t believe that you believe what I believe”: an experiment on misperceptions of social norms and whistleblowing

Behnud Mir Djawadi, Sabrina Plaß, Sabrina Loer
article en

Abstract

Social norms shape economic decision-making, yet individuals often systematically misperceive what others think and do, potentially leading to suboptimal social outcomes. While existing research has demonstrated the prevalence and consequences of norm misperceptions across various domains, the literature has remained surprisingly silent on norm-enforcing behaviours. Despite their important role in providing collective benefits, these behaviours are regularly avoided because they may be viewed ambivalently by peers and create personal costs and interpersonal conflict for the actor. Using whistleblowing as an example of a broader category of regulatory behaviour, we examine whether i) norm misperceptions inhibit enforcement actions in the form of whistleblowing, and ii) norm-based interventions can effectively induce a behavioural change in this challenging domain. Through survey data and an incentivised laboratory experiment, we demonstrate that while a majority of individuals (77.55 %) privately support whistleblowing, almost half (45.92 %) misperceive the majority's view. This misperception has significant behavioural consequences: even when individuals personally support whistleblowing, their likelihood of reporting decreases by more than 30 % when normative expectations are perceived to favour silence rather than reporting. A social information intervention revealing the distribution of peer support shows only modest effectiveness. While it marginally increases whistleblowing among those already personally favouring reporting, it does not affect those who personally oppose whistleblowing. Our findings demonstrate the boundaries of norm interventions in enforcement contexts and suggest that, specifically for whistleblowing, corrections of norm misperceptions should not be viewed as substitutes for conventional approaches, such as financial incentives or whistleblower protection, in promoting whistleblowing.

European Economic ReviewVol. 180
Paderborn University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.