Digital Justice and Corporate Borrowing: Evidence From a Quasi‐Natural Experiment

ABSTRACT Previous research documents conflicting views on the impact of strengthening creditor rights on corporate borrowing. Using the establishment of an Internet‐integrated judicial enforcement system (i.e., smart courts) in China as a quasi‐natural experiment, this study examines the impact of digital justice on creditors' lending decisions. We posit that smart courts improve the judicial system's efficiency, quality, and fairness, thereby reducing creditors' costs and risks and facilitating corporate borrowing. We find that firms in cities with established smart courts obtain relatively larger loans at lower costs. The effects of smart courts are more pronounced for firms with weak political connections and elevated information asymmetry and are particularly stronger in regions characterised by weaker legal protection. Overall, our findings highlight the positive impact of digital justice on the efficiency and quality of the legal system and its externalities extending beyond the legal sphere to corporate financing activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting and Finance
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70118
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Justice and Corporate Borrowing: Evidence From a Quasi‐Natural Experiment

Meiting Lu, Yuqiang Cao, Manni Zheng, Zhuoan Feng et al.
Accounting and Finance
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Digital Justice and Corporate Borrowing: Evidence From a Quasi‐Natural Experiment

Meiting Lu, Yuqiang Cao, Manni Zheng, Zhuoan Feng, Yaowen Shan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Previous research documents conflicting views on the impact of strengthening creditor rights on corporate borrowing. Using the establishment of an Internet‐integrated judicial enforcement system (i.e., smart courts) in China as a quasi‐natural experiment, this study examines the impact of digital justice on creditors' lending decisions. We posit that smart courts improve the judicial system's efficiency, quality, and fairness, thereby reducing creditors' costs and risks and facilitating corporate borrowing. We find that firms in cities with established smart courts obtain relatively larger loans at lower costs. The effects of smart courts are more pronounced for firms with weak political connections and elevated information asymmetry and are particularly stronger in regions characterised by weaker legal protection. Overall, our findings highlight the positive impact of digital justice on the efficiency and quality of the legal system and its externalities extending beyond the legal sphere to corporate financing activities.

Accounting and FinanceVol. 66(1)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN), South China Normal University (CN), MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital Justice and Corporate Borrowing: Evidence From a Quasi‐Natural Experiment — Meiting Lu, Yuqiang Cao, et al. · Accounting and Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS