Network governance in Finnish higher education and science policy, 2012–2021

Abstract Finnish higher education and science policy has been characterised as corporatist, but reforms after the 1990s have created conditions for a more network-based governance mode of policymaking. These networks empower various stakeholders to participate in policy processes, but they also allow the government, particularly the Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC), to promote the government’s interests in and govern through stakeholder networks. In this paper, we ask what kind of network the government (the MEC) uses in higher education and science policymaking, and how it uses the network. We examined a network of organisations that participated in Finnish higher education and science policy in 2012–2021 via the working groups of the MEC. Our methods were social network analysis and expert interviews ( N = 23). Our results show that the network had a small core set of key actors that consisted of state ministries and agencies, universities and their associations, employer and employee unions, and student unions. The network was centralised around the MEC and stable over time, and it was used for knowledge exchange, interest intermediation, and policy advocacy. These are traits of traditional corporatism. Nevertheless, we found that the MEC played a dual role of a coordinator and stakeholder-lobbyist, reflecting more horizontally equal relationships between the actors, especially at the network’s core, which is characteristic of networked governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01557-2
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Network governance in Finnish higher education and science policy, 2012–2021

Jarmo Kallunki, Sofía Viseu, Paula Silvén
Higher Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Network governance in Finnish higher education and science policy, 2012–2021

Jarmo Kallunki, Sofía Viseu, Paula Silvén
article en

Abstract

Abstract Finnish higher education and science policy has been characterised as corporatist, but reforms after the 1990s have created conditions for a more network-based governance mode of policymaking. These networks empower various stakeholders to participate in policy processes, but they also allow the government, particularly the Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC), to promote the government’s interests in and govern through stakeholder networks. In this paper, we ask what kind of network the government (the MEC) uses in higher education and science policymaking, and how it uses the network. We examined a network of organisations that participated in Finnish higher education and science policy in 2012–2021 via the working groups of the MEC. Our methods were social network analysis and expert interviews ( N = 23). Our results show that the network had a small core set of key actors that consisted of state ministries and agencies, universities and their associations, employer and employee unions, and student unions. The network was centralised around the MEC and stable over time, and it was used for knowledge exchange, interest intermediation, and policy advocacy. These are traits of traditional corporatism. Nevertheless, we found that the MEC played a dual role of a coordinator and stakeholder-lobbyist, reflecting more horizontally equal relationships between the actors, especially at the network’s core, which is characteristic of networked governance.

Higher Education
University of Lisbon (PT), Tampere University (FI), Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências (PT)
Tays, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.