Family supportive supervision, trust, and perceived job security

Purpose Perceived job security is positively associated with employee and organizational outcomes, yet antecedents to perceived job security remain understudied. Drawing on signaling theory, this study examines how family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSBs) influence employee perceptions of job security and the role interpersonal trust plays. Design/methodology/approach To test the hypothesized model, the authors utilized a two-wave study design of working adults in the U.S. (n = 165), analyzing the data using PROCESS Macro model 4. Findings All four dimensions of FSSB (emotional support, instrumental support, role modeling, and creative work-family management) and overall FSSB are positively associated with employee-perceived job security directly and indirectly through affect-based trust. Cognition-based trust fully mediates the relationships between emotional support, instrumental support and perceived job security, partially mediating the relationships among role modeling, creative work-family management, overall FSSB and perceived job security. Originality/value The perceived job security literature is extended to explore antecedents and illustrate how FSSBs, along with trust, positively influence employee-perceived job security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Decision
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/md-10-2024-2364
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family supportive supervision, trust, and perceived job security

Julie Irene Hancock, Wenjuan Guo, Junnan Cui, Todd Royle
Management Decision
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Family supportive supervision, trust, and perceived job security

Julie Irene Hancock, Wenjuan Guo, Junnan Cui, Todd Royle
article en

Abstract

Purpose Perceived job security is positively associated with employee and organizational outcomes, yet antecedents to perceived job security remain understudied. Drawing on signaling theory, this study examines how family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSBs) influence employee perceptions of job security and the role interpersonal trust plays. Design/methodology/approach To test the hypothesized model, the authors utilized a two-wave study design of working adults in the U.S. (n = 165), analyzing the data using PROCESS Macro model 4. Findings All four dimensions of FSSB (emotional support, instrumental support, role modeling, and creative work-family management) and overall FSSB are positively associated with employee-perceived job security directly and indirectly through affect-based trust. Cognition-based trust fully mediates the relationships between emotional support, instrumental support and perceived job security, partially mediating the relationships among role modeling, creative work-family management, overall FSSB and perceived job security. Originality/value The perceived job security literature is extended to explore antecedents and illustrate how FSSBs, along with trust, positively influence employee-perceived job security.

Management Decision
Valdosta State University (US), University of North Texas (US), Illinois State University (US), Chicago State University (US), University of North Texas at Dallas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Family supportive supervision, trust, and perceived job security — Julie Irene Hancock, Wenjuan Guo, et al. · Management Decision (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS