Perioperative pembrolizumab, trastuzumab and FLOT in HER2-positive localized esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 trial

Perioperative treatment strategies for HER2-positive esophagogastric adenocarcinoma remain suboptimal. Here in the open-label, phase 2 IKF/AIO PHERFLOT trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of adding pembrolizumab and trastuzumab to FLOT chemotherapy in patients with localized HER2-positive esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoints are the pathological complete response rate and the 2-year disease-free survival rate. Secondary endpoints include the R0 resection rate, feasibility and safety. Exploratory endpoints include clinical efficacy in molecularly defined subgroups. In this prespecified interim analysis, given the limited median follow-up period of 14.8 months, only one of the primary endpoints, the pathological complete response rate, and selected secondary endpoints, including the R0 resection rate, feasibility and safety, are reported here. Among 31 enrolled patients, 30 proceeded to R0 resection, and one patient declined surgery without disease progression. The combination regimen resulted in grade ≥3 treatment-related serious adverse events in 48.4% of patients (15 out of 31) aligning with established toxicity profiles of the respective agents and no treatment-related deaths. After four cycles of therapy, the pathological complete response rate was 48.4% (95% confidence interval 30.2-66.9; 15 out of 31) in the intention-to-treat population, and the subtotal regression rate (TRG1b according to Becker classification) was 19.4% (95% confidence interval 7.5-37.5; 6 out of 31), resulting in a major pathological response rate of 67.7% (95% confidence interval 48.6-83.3; 21 out of 31). Responses tended to be enriched in tumors with strong HER2 expression (immunohistochemistry 3+), high PD-L1 combined positive scores and lower T stage, but were also observed in substantial fractions of HER2 immunohistochemistry 2+/ISH+, T3 or T4 and combined positive scores <10 tumors. These findings support the feasibility and antitumor activity of perioperative chemoimmunotherapy targeting HER2 and PD-1 and warrant further validation in randomized trials. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05504720 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Medicine
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03979-y
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perioperative pembrolizumab, trastuzumab and FLOT in HER2-positive localized esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 trial

Sylvie Lorenzen, Claudia Pauligk, Nils Homann, Eray Goekkurt et al.
7 citations
Nature Medicine
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
10.63
article

Perioperative pembrolizumab, trastuzumab and FLOT in HER2-positive localized esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 trial

Sylvie Lorenzen, Claudia Pauligk, Nils Homann, Eray Goekkurt, Viktor Rempel, Mariana Santos Cruz, Joseph Tintelnot, Teresa J. Broering, Benjamin Thiele, Ralf‐Dieter Hofheinz, Thomas J. Ettrich, Gabriele Margareta Siegler, Thorsten Oliver Goetze, Barbara Gruen, Mascha Binder, Alexander Stein, Nicolas Moosmann, Christian Müller, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Perioperative treatment strategies for HER2-positive esophagogastric adenocarcinoma remain suboptimal. Here in the open-label, phase 2 IKF/AIO PHERFLOT trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of adding pembrolizumab and trastuzumab to FLOT chemotherapy in patients with localized HER2-positive esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoints are the pathological complete response rate and the 2-year disease-free survival rate. Secondary endpoints include the R0 resection rate, feasibility and safety. Exploratory endpoints include clinical efficacy in molecularly defined subgroups. In this prespecified interim analysis, given the limited median follow-up period of 14.8 months, only one of the primary endpoints, the pathological complete response rate, and selected secondary endpoints, including the R0 resection rate, feasibility and safety, are reported here. Among 31 enrolled patients, 30 proceeded to R0 resection, and one patient declined surgery without disease progression. The combination regimen resulted in grade ≥3 treatment-related serious adverse events in 48.4% of patients (15 out of 31) aligning with established toxicity profiles of the respective agents and no treatment-related deaths. After four cycles of therapy, the pathological complete response rate was 48.4% (95% confidence interval 30.2-66.9; 15 out of 31) in the intention-to-treat population, and the subtotal regression rate (TRG1b according to Becker classification) was 19.4% (95% confidence interval 7.5-37.5; 6 out of 31), resulting in a major pathological response rate of 67.7% (95% confidence interval 48.6-83.3; 21 out of 31). Responses tended to be enriched in tumors with strong HER2 expression (immunohistochemistry 3+), high PD-L1 combined positive scores and lower T stage, but were also observed in substantial fractions of HER2 immunohistochemistry 2+/ISH+, T3 or T4 and combined positive scores <10 tumors. These findings support the feasibility and antitumor activity of perioperative chemoimmunotherapy targeting HER2 and PD-1 and warrant further validation in randomized trials. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05504720 .

Nature MedicineVol. 31(12)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Eppendorf (Germany) (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Hospital of Basel (CH), TUM Klinikum (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder (DE), Institute of Clinical Cancer Research (DE), Krankenhaus Nordwest (DE), Fraunhofer Project Centre Wolfsburg (DE), Kliniken Essen-Mitte (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE), University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE), St. Anna Hospital (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
10.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.