Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome

Abstract Background The researchers aimed in this study to compare the impact of progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) in comparison to the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in patients with PCOS as regards the number of oocytes aspirated, percentage of MII oocytes, and the good-quality blastocysts rate which are valid for cryopreservation. Methods 100 female patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) were retrieved. They were then subsequently randomized into two separate groups of equal size: Group A (50 cases) received GnRH-antagonist SC injection from the 6th day of ovarian stimulation and was continued till the GnRH agonist trigger day. However, group B (50 cases) received a daily dose of 20 mg dydrogesterone from day 1 or 2 of menstruation and was continued till the GnRH agonist trigger day. We compared both protocols regarding the quantity of oocytes aspirated, the percentage of MII oocytes, and the good-quality blastocysts rate which are valid for cryopreservation. Also, we compared the fertilization rate, blastocyst rate, and clinical pregnancy rate after the first FET. Results The mean number of retrieved oocytes and the percentage of MII oocytes in group A were 33.22 oocytes and 78.06% respectively, while in group B was 36.85 oocytes and 77.62% respectively showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups, as the p -value was more than 0.05. The rate of good-quality blastocysts was 28.72% in group A and 29.14% in group B, indicating there was no significant difference, with a p -value of 0.44. Conclusion When it comes to the number of recovered oocytes, the percentage of MII oocytes, the rate of high-quality blastocysts available, and finally, the clinical pregnancy rate following the first FET, the recent PPOS protocol was just as successful as the GnRH-antagonist protocol for the controlled ovarian stimulation in PCOS patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-025-00261-6
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome

Yasser Orief, Ismail Khalifa, Sherif Gaafar, Mervat Sheikh ElArab
Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Ovarian function and disorders
article

Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome

Yasser Orief, Ismail Khalifa, Sherif Gaafar, Mervat Sheikh ElArab
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The researchers aimed in this study to compare the impact of progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) in comparison to the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in patients with PCOS as regards the number of oocytes aspirated, percentage of MII oocytes, and the good-quality blastocysts rate which are valid for cryopreservation. Methods 100 female patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) were retrieved. They were then subsequently randomized into two separate groups of equal size: Group A (50 cases) received GnRH-antagonist SC injection from the 6th day of ovarian stimulation and was continued till the GnRH agonist trigger day. However, group B (50 cases) received a daily dose of 20 mg dydrogesterone from day 1 or 2 of menstruation and was continued till the GnRH agonist trigger day. We compared both protocols regarding the quantity of oocytes aspirated, the percentage of MII oocytes, and the good-quality blastocysts rate which are valid for cryopreservation. Also, we compared the fertilization rate, blastocyst rate, and clinical pregnancy rate after the first FET. Results The mean number of retrieved oocytes and the percentage of MII oocytes in group A were 33.22 oocytes and 78.06% respectively, while in group B was 36.85 oocytes and 77.62% respectively showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups, as the p -value was more than 0.05. The rate of good-quality blastocysts was 28.72% in group A and 29.14% in group B, indicating there was no significant difference, with a p -value of 0.44. Conclusion When it comes to the number of recovered oocytes, the percentage of MII oocytes, the rate of high-quality blastocysts available, and finally, the clinical pregnancy rate following the first FET, the recent PPOS protocol was just as successful as the GnRH-antagonist protocol for the controlled ovarian stimulation in PCOS patients.

Middle East Fertility Society JournalVol. 30(1)
Alexandria University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Ovarian function and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.