AI and the Complexity of Pain

Abstract Pain is a complex, multidimensional phenomenon. Pain research documents cases where our disregard of diverse pain experiences leads to epistemic injustices against those who suffer from pain. Automated pain detection technologies use limited behavioural and physiological indicators and are trained on insufficiently diverse datasets. These technologies can potentially exacerbate existing epistemic harms against pain sufferers, particularly marginalised groups. I argue that we must carefully consider the diverse presentations of pain and their neurological, biological, psychological, and social dimensions when implementing AI-based pain assessment tools. To prevent deepening epistemic injustices in pain care, we must develop AI systems by collecting diverse datasets, implementing explainable algorithms, maintaining transparency in data and algorithms, and incorporating flexibility for ongoing improvements. Preserving pain’s complexity when developing these technologies helps prevent further marginalising those who experience pain, particularly vulnerable populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00988-0
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI and the Complexity of Pain

Hadeel Naeem
Philosophy & Technology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI and the Complexity of Pain

Hadeel Naeem
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pain is a complex, multidimensional phenomenon. Pain research documents cases where our disregard of diverse pain experiences leads to epistemic injustices against those who suffer from pain. Automated pain detection technologies use limited behavioural and physiological indicators and are trained on insufficiently diverse datasets. These technologies can potentially exacerbate existing epistemic harms against pain sufferers, particularly marginalised groups. I argue that we must carefully consider the diverse presentations of pain and their neurological, biological, psychological, and social dimensions when implementing AI-based pain assessment tools. To prevent deepening epistemic injustices in pain care, we must develop AI systems by collecting diverse datasets, implementing explainable algorithms, maintaining transparency in data and algorithms, and incorporating flexibility for ongoing improvements. Preserving pain’s complexity when developing these technologies helps prevent further marginalising those who experience pain, particularly vulnerable populations.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 38(4)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.