Enacting and re-politicising co-design: a critical perspective on eHealth interventions

Abstract The recent institutionalisation of the co-design approach in eHealth interventions has resulted in an increased focus on providing technological solutions rather than addressing social issues, which has led co-design to gradually lose its political value. The aim of this theoretical article is to propose a re-politicisation of the co-design process of eHealth technologies through the application of the concept of “enactment”. Drawing on various interpretation of this concept, this paper argues for the merits of scrutinising the co-design of eHealth technologies as a dual process of enactment. One the one hand, eHealth technologies are enacted by the practices of individuals involved in the co-design process, such as researchers, stakeholders, tech producers and users. On the other hand, these computational systems enact individuals as objects of concern through structural elements like affordances and datafication processes. Thus, the concept of “enactment” serves as a critical lens for exploring how different figures involved in co-design both shape and are shaped by the socio-technical systems they participate in producing, whilst also examining how diverse forms of social power, inequalities and knowledge imbalances are negotiated and brought into being within this dynamic and relational process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Theory & Health
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-025-00239-4
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enacting and re-politicising co-design: a critical perspective on eHealth interventions

Riccardo Pronzato
Social Theory & Health
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Enacting and re-politicising co-design: a critical perspective on eHealth interventions

Riccardo Pronzato
article en

Abstract

Abstract The recent institutionalisation of the co-design approach in eHealth interventions has resulted in an increased focus on providing technological solutions rather than addressing social issues, which has led co-design to gradually lose its political value. The aim of this theoretical article is to propose a re-politicisation of the co-design process of eHealth technologies through the application of the concept of “enactment”. Drawing on various interpretation of this concept, this paper argues for the merits of scrutinising the co-design of eHealth technologies as a dual process of enactment. One the one hand, eHealth technologies are enacted by the practices of individuals involved in the co-design process, such as researchers, stakeholders, tech producers and users. On the other hand, these computational systems enact individuals as objects of concern through structural elements like affordances and datafication processes. Thus, the concept of “enactment” serves as a critical lens for exploring how different figures involved in co-design both shape and are shaped by the socio-technical systems they participate in producing, whilst also examining how diverse forms of social power, inequalities and knowledge imbalances are negotiated and brought into being within this dynamic and relational process.

Social Theory & HealthVol. 23(1)
IULM University (IT)
European Commission, Università di Bologna
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.