Faculty use of open and affordable course materials over time: Rethinking value and impact

This study examines long-term faculty engagement with open educational resources (OER) and affordable course materials following their participation in a library-funded course redesign initiative (2016–2024). A survey was administered to 138 awardees, with a 55 % response rate. The research assessed whether faculty continued to use, revise, or abandon the open and affordable materials they initially adopted and explored broader impacts on teaching practices. Most respondents continued using open and affordable materials or updated them with other low-cost options. Notably, 21 faculty redesigned additional courses without further funding. Results suggest that open and affordable course materials became increasingly integrated into faculty teaching practices over time. The study also considers the concept of cumulative student savings as a metric for program success, raising questions about how to define and track long-term impact. Findings highlight the importance of sustained library support to encourage continued use, innovation, and scalability of affordability initiatives in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103155
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Open Education and E-Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Faculty use of open and affordable course materials over time: Rethinking value and impact

Zara Wilkinson, Lily Todorinova
1 citations
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Open Education and E-Learning
1.69
article

Faculty use of open and affordable course materials over time: Rethinking value and impact

Zara Wilkinson, Lily Todorinova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines long-term faculty engagement with open educational resources (OER) and affordable course materials following their participation in a library-funded course redesign initiative (2016–2024). A survey was administered to 138 awardees, with a 55 % response rate. The research assessed whether faculty continued to use, revise, or abandon the open and affordable materials they initially adopted and explored broader impacts on teaching practices. Most respondents continued using open and affordable materials or updated them with other low-cost options. Notably, 21 faculty redesigned additional courses without further funding. Results suggest that open and affordable course materials became increasingly integrated into faculty teaching practices over time. The study also considers the concept of cumulative student savings as a metric for program success, raising questions about how to define and track long-term impact. Findings highlight the importance of sustained library support to encourage continued use, innovation, and scalability of affordability initiatives in higher education.

The Journal of Academic LibrarianshipVol. 51(6)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Open Education and E-Learning
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Faculty use of open and affordable course materials over time: Rethinking value and impact — Zara Wilkinson, Lily Todorinova · The Journal of Academic Librarianship (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS