Effect of broiler litter stockpiling methods on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions

Broiler litter (BL) has the potential to emit ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), which have a greater impact on climate change. Understanding the impact of stockpiling methods on emissions is essential, as they influence the emission rates. This study focused on quantifying the emissions of N<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4,</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> from the BL stockpiles during 126 days of storage under three stockpiling conditions a) Broiler litter stockpile covered with tarp (treatment-T), b) uncovered litter stockpile (treatment-U), c) Broiler litter stockpile covered with a 0.08 m layer of soil (treatment-S). Gas emissions were measured with an INNOVA-1512 photoacoustic gas analyzer. Daily emission rates were calculated by using the ideal gas equation, and cumulative emissions were calculated from interpolated daily emission rates. The results suggested that over the 126 days of storage period, treatment-T emitted significantly lower (P < 0.05) cumulative NH<sub>3</sub>-N (89.5 g m<sup>-2</sup>), N<sub>2</sub>O-N (47.85g m<sup>-2</sup>), CO<sub>2</sub>-C (9708.5 g m<sup>-2</sup>), and CH<sub>4</sub>-C (123.27 g m<sup>-2</sup>) emissions compared to treatments -U and -S. Covering the BL stockpiles with a tarp reduced the NH<sub>3</sub>-N, N<sub>2</sub>O-N, CO<sub>2</sub>-C, and CH<sub>4</sub>-C emissions by 38 %, 54 %, 28 %, and 19 %, respectively, compared to the control (treatment -U). In contrast, covering BL with soil (treatment-S) increased the NH<sub>3</sub>-N, N<sub>2</sub>O-N, CO<sub>2</sub>-C, and CH<sub>4</sub>-C emissions by 13 %, 17 %, 123 %, and 9 %, respectively, compared to the control (treatment-U). Overall global warming potential (GWP) expressed as CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents (CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) was also low for treatment-T, indicating its effectiveness in mitigating emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poultry Science
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105979
Primary Topic
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of broiler litter stockpiling methods on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions

Henry Allen Torbert, Dexter B. Watts, Rishi Prasad, Debolina Chakraborty et al.
Poultry Science
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
article

Effect of broiler litter stockpiling methods on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions

Henry Allen Torbert, Dexter B. Watts, Rishi Prasad, Debolina Chakraborty, Shruthi Koneti
article en

Abstract

Broiler litter (BL) has the potential to emit ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), which have a greater impact on climate change. Understanding the impact of stockpiling methods on emissions is essential, as they influence the emission rates. This study focused on quantifying the emissions of N<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4,</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> from the BL stockpiles during 126 days of storage under three stockpiling conditions a) Broiler litter stockpile covered with tarp (treatment-T), b) uncovered litter stockpile (treatment-U), c) Broiler litter stockpile covered with a 0.08 m layer of soil (treatment-S). Gas emissions were measured with an INNOVA-1512 photoacoustic gas analyzer. Daily emission rates were calculated by using the ideal gas equation, and cumulative emissions were calculated from interpolated daily emission rates. The results suggested that over the 126 days of storage period, treatment-T emitted significantly lower (P < 0.05) cumulative NH<sub>3</sub>-N (89.5 g m<sup>-2</sup>), N<sub>2</sub>O-N (47.85g m<sup>-2</sup>), CO<sub>2</sub>-C (9708.5 g m<sup>-2</sup>), and CH<sub>4</sub>-C (123.27 g m<sup>-2</sup>) emissions compared to treatments -U and -S. Covering the BL stockpiles with a tarp reduced the NH<sub>3</sub>-N, N<sub>2</sub>O-N, CO<sub>2</sub>-C, and CH<sub>4</sub>-C emissions by 38 %, 54 %, 28 %, and 19 %, respectively, compared to the control (treatment -U). In contrast, covering BL with soil (treatment-S) increased the NH<sub>3</sub>-N, N<sub>2</sub>O-N, CO<sub>2</sub>-C, and CH<sub>4</sub>-C emissions by 13 %, 17 %, 123 %, and 9 %, respectively, compared to the control (treatment-U). Overall global warming potential (GWP) expressed as CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents (CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) was also low for treatment-T, indicating its effectiveness in mitigating emissions.

Poultry ScienceVol. 104(12)
National Soil Dynamics Research Laboratory (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.