On “minor” adverse effects: some misconceptions affecting the handling of epistemic risks in medical research

One of the main reasons for discontinuing hormonal contraceptives or switching to less effective methods is the experience of perceived side effects. Users are particularly bothered by symptoms that health professionals consider to be mild and generally tolerable. Although these symptoms are important to users, they are rarely mentioned in evidence-based guidelines; on the contrary, medical professionals often assume that there is no evidence of a link between minor adverse symptoms and hormonal contraceptives. I will argue that this position and the following communication towards is fundamentally grounded in flawed epistemic standards and unsuitable value influences that do not reflect all the epistemic interests relevant to clinical practice. These problematic value influences set a high, unproductive evidence standard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.102080
Primary Topic
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On “minor” adverse effects: some misconceptions affecting the handling of epistemic risks in medical research

Ilvie Prince
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
article

On “minor” adverse effects: some misconceptions affecting the handling of epistemic risks in medical research

Ilvie Prince
article en

Abstract

One of the main reasons for discontinuing hormonal contraceptives or switching to less effective methods is the experience of perceived side effects. Users are particularly bothered by symptoms that health professionals consider to be mild and generally tolerable. Although these symptoms are important to users, they are rarely mentioned in evidence-based guidelines; on the contrary, medical professionals often assume that there is no evidence of a link between minor adverse symptoms and hormonal contraceptives. I will argue that this position and the following communication towards is fundamentally grounded in flawed epistemic standards and unsuitable value influences that do not reflect all the epistemic interests relevant to clinical practice. These problematic value influences set a high, unproductive evidence standard.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part AVol. 114
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On “minor” adverse effects: some misconceptions affecting the handling of epistemic risks in medical research — Ilvie Prince · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS