Misgendering algorithms: Insights from a cross-sectional survey on algorithmic gender classification in social media

Social media platforms rely on Gender Classification Systems (GCSs) to infer users’ gender from behavioral and demographic data, often without explicit consent. These systems optimize targeted advertising and user engagement but introduce significant ethical and regulatory concerns related to algorithmic bias, privacy, data governance, and accountability. Our study presents a large-scale survey ( N = 1642 ) analyzing the accuracy and implications of X’s (formerly Twitter) gender inference mechanisms that reveal systemic biases that disproportionately impact marginalized communities. Our findings indicate that men are less likely to experience misclassification than women. Furthermore, LGBTIQ+ individuals and those with non-conforming gender expressions face significantly higher risks of algorithmic misidentification. These results expose critical vulnerabilities in automated profiling systems and highlight the limitations of reductionist, binary technical frameworks applied to the inherently complex and fluid nature of gender identity. Our work underscores the urgent need for improved information management practices involving GCSs, emphasizing compliance, transparency, and user agency. By addressing these challenges, platforms can better align with evolving regulatory frameworks and societal expectations regarding data responsibility, fairness, and inclusion. These insights contribute to the growing imperative for inclusive, rights-based algorithmic governance across social media platforms. • Algorithms on social media platforms risk misgendering users based on inferences. • Social media X (formerly Twitter) shows several misgendering classification issues. • Women are more likely than men to experience misclassification by the algorithm. • LGBTIQ+ individuals are significantly more likely to experience misclassifications. • Policy updates are needed to regulate the use of Gender Classification Systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Society
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103110
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misgendering algorithms: Insights from a cross-sectional survey on algorithmic gender classification in social media

Bart Custers, Antoni Mut-Piña, Adam Poulsen, Tessa Verhoef et al.
Technology in Society
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Misgendering algorithms: Insights from a cross-sectional survey on algorithmic gender classification in social media

Bart Custers, Antoni Mut-Piña, Adam Poulsen, Tessa Verhoef, Roger A. Søraa, Eduard Fosch‐Villaronga
article en

Abstract

Social media platforms rely on Gender Classification Systems (GCSs) to infer users’ gender from behavioral and demographic data, often without explicit consent. These systems optimize targeted advertising and user engagement but introduce significant ethical and regulatory concerns related to algorithmic bias, privacy, data governance, and accountability. Our study presents a large-scale survey ( N = 1642 ) analyzing the accuracy and implications of X’s (formerly Twitter) gender inference mechanisms that reveal systemic biases that disproportionately impact marginalized communities. Our findings indicate that men are less likely to experience misclassification than women. Furthermore, LGBTIQ+ individuals and those with non-conforming gender expressions face significantly higher risks of algorithmic misidentification. These results expose critical vulnerabilities in automated profiling systems and highlight the limitations of reductionist, binary technical frameworks applied to the inherently complex and fluid nature of gender identity. Our work underscores the urgent need for improved information management practices involving GCSs, emphasizing compliance, transparency, and user agency. By addressing these challenges, platforms can better align with evolving regulatory frameworks and societal expectations regarding data responsibility, fairness, and inclusion. These insights contribute to the growing imperative for inclusive, rights-based algorithmic governance across social media platforms. • Algorithms on social media platforms risk misgendering users based on inferences. • Social media X (formerly Twitter) shows several misgendering classification issues. • Women are more likely than men to experience misclassification by the algorithm. • LGBTIQ+ individuals are significantly more likely to experience misclassifications. • Policy updates are needed to regulate the use of Gender Classification Systems.

Technology in SocietyVol. 84
Leiden University (NL), The University of Sydney (AU), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.