Hybrid CNN–GRU–XGBoost framework for optimized coronary artery disease diagnosis and risk stratification

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading driver of cardiovascular mortality, requiring diagnostic systems that deliver high discrimination, stability under class imbalance, and reproducible deployment. This work presents a hybrid pipeline that integrates convolutional encoders for localized feature interactions, gated recurrent units (GRUs) for conditional dependency modeling over ordered clinical attributes, and an extreme gradient-boosted tree classifier (XTree) for nonlinear decision refinement and feature-level attribution. The data pathway applies strict train-split isolation with source-aware quantile imputation, proximal denoising, robust trimmed standardization, stratified partitioning that preserves class and source distributions, and manifold-conformal minority augmentation to improve boundary coverage without leakage. Evaluation on the UCI Heart Disease cohort (Cleveland, Long Beach V, Switzerland, Hungary; p=14 attributes) used an 80/20 holdout and standard metrics. The proposed CNN-GRU-XTree attained 96.03% accuracy, 94.70% precision, 97.66% sensitivity, 96.17% F1, and 94.35% specificity. Relative to the strongest non-proposed baseline (CNN-LSTM-XTree: 95.63% accuracy, 94.70% precision, 96.90% sensitivity, 95.80% F1, 94.47% specificity), gains reached +0.40 percentage points (pp) in accuracy, +0.76 pp in sensitivity, and +0.37 pp in F1, with parity in precision and a negligible specificity delta (-0.12 pp). Against CNN-GRU-RF (95.24%/94.70%/96.15%/95.42%/94.18%), improvements were +0.79 pp accuracy, +1.51 pp sensitivity, +0.75 pp F1, and +0.17 pp specificity. Case-based simulations (600 min each) probed model behavior under clinically distinct conditions. In severe, unequivocal CAD, sensitivity remained ≥97% with specificity >93%; in low-risk asymptomatic profiles, specificity remained ≥95% with precision ≥93%; in borderline phenotypes with overlapping risk markers, F1 exceeded 94% while maintaining balanced error profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Biology and Chemistry
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2025.108725
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid CNN–GRU–XGBoost framework for optimized coronary artery disease diagnosis and risk stratification

Muhammad Adnan, Arnab Kumar Biswas, Yi Yang, Sara Khan
Computational Biology and Chemistry
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Hybrid CNN–GRU–XGBoost framework for optimized coronary artery disease diagnosis and risk stratification

Muhammad Adnan, Arnab Kumar Biswas, Yi Yang, Sara Khan
article en

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading driver of cardiovascular mortality, requiring diagnostic systems that deliver high discrimination, stability under class imbalance, and reproducible deployment. This work presents a hybrid pipeline that integrates convolutional encoders for localized feature interactions, gated recurrent units (GRUs) for conditional dependency modeling over ordered clinical attributes, and an extreme gradient-boosted tree classifier (XTree) for nonlinear decision refinement and feature-level attribution. The data pathway applies strict train-split isolation with source-aware quantile imputation, proximal denoising, robust trimmed standardization, stratified partitioning that preserves class and source distributions, and manifold-conformal minority augmentation to improve boundary coverage without leakage. Evaluation on the UCI Heart Disease cohort (Cleveland, Long Beach V, Switzerland, Hungary; p=14 attributes) used an 80/20 holdout and standard metrics. The proposed CNN-GRU-XTree attained 96.03% accuracy, 94.70% precision, 97.66% sensitivity, 96.17% F1, and 94.35% specificity. Relative to the strongest non-proposed baseline (CNN-LSTM-XTree: 95.63% accuracy, 94.70% precision, 96.90% sensitivity, 95.80% F1, 94.47% specificity), gains reached +0.40 percentage points (pp) in accuracy, +0.76 pp in sensitivity, and +0.37 pp in F1, with parity in precision and a negligible specificity delta (-0.12 pp). Against CNN-GRU-RF (95.24%/94.70%/96.15%/95.42%/94.18%), improvements were +0.79 pp accuracy, +1.51 pp sensitivity, +0.75 pp F1, and +0.17 pp specificity. Case-based simulations (600 min each) probed model behavior under clinically distinct conditions. In severe, unequivocal CAD, sensitivity remained ≥97% with specificity >93%; in low-risk asymptomatic profiles, specificity remained ≥95% with precision ≥93%; in borderline phenotypes with overlapping risk markers, F1 exceeded 94% while maintaining balanced error profiles.

Computational Biology and ChemistryVol. 120(Pt 2)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Haripur (PK), Yangzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.