Let's meet at the (climate) club: The contributions of the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) to sustainable bioenergy governance

As global energy and climate governance is becoming increasingly polycentric, climate clubs have been put forward as a promising tool that could help move climate action forward. Recent decades have witnessed a proliferation of climate clubs and club-like arrangements. While theoretical work has focused on the different forms of climate clubs and the various roles they (could) play in this context, the empirical record of climate clubs has received less scholarly attention. This article seeks to contribute to filling this gap by evaluating the role in global climate and bioenergy governance of the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP), a government-driven international initiative established in 2006 to promote the sustainable and efficient use of bioenergy and biomass. This study presents a framework of four criteria (operational structure, governance functions, club benefits and legitimacy) and applies it to interview data to assess GBEP's contributions to bioenergy governance. First, while GBEP is supported by a structured secretariat and has attracted a diverse membership, funding constraints have recently led to real financial pressures. Second, while GBEP fulfils a range of important governance functions, such as capacity-building or sustainability indicator-setting, its low agenda-setting powers and policy development capabilities have not allowed it to play a larger role in global bioenergy governance. Third, GBEP offers a range of important but limited benefits to its members, mainly due to its modest financial means. Finally, GBEP occupies a unique niche in the global bioenergy governance space, but fluctuating support from its members has limited its political weight. • Climate clubs have emerged as an option that could help move climate action forward. • In contrast to theoretical work, their empirical record has received less attention. • Structure, governance functions, club benefits & legitimacy serve as evaluation criteria. • The Global Bioenergy Partnership is an important actor in bioenergy governance. • Fluctuating support from members and funding constraints limit its political weight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104384
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Let's meet at the (climate) club: The contributions of the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) to sustainable bioenergy governance

Stavros Afionis
Energy Research & Social Science
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Let's meet at the (climate) club: The contributions of the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) to sustainable bioenergy governance

Stavros Afionis
article en

Abstract

As global energy and climate governance is becoming increasingly polycentric, climate clubs have been put forward as a promising tool that could help move climate action forward. Recent decades have witnessed a proliferation of climate clubs and club-like arrangements. While theoretical work has focused on the different forms of climate clubs and the various roles they (could) play in this context, the empirical record of climate clubs has received less scholarly attention. This article seeks to contribute to filling this gap by evaluating the role in global climate and bioenergy governance of the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP), a government-driven international initiative established in 2006 to promote the sustainable and efficient use of bioenergy and biomass. This study presents a framework of four criteria (operational structure, governance functions, club benefits and legitimacy) and applies it to interview data to assess GBEP's contributions to bioenergy governance. First, while GBEP is supported by a structured secretariat and has attracted a diverse membership, funding constraints have recently led to real financial pressures. Second, while GBEP fulfils a range of important governance functions, such as capacity-building or sustainability indicator-setting, its low agenda-setting powers and policy development capabilities have not allowed it to play a larger role in global bioenergy governance. Third, GBEP offers a range of important but limited benefits to its members, mainly due to its modest financial means. Finally, GBEP occupies a unique niche in the global bioenergy governance space, but fluctuating support from its members has limited its political weight. • Climate clubs have emerged as an option that could help move climate action forward. • In contrast to theoretical work, their empirical record has received less attention. • Structure, governance functions, club benefits & legitimacy serve as evaluation criteria. • The Global Bioenergy Partnership is an important actor in bioenergy governance. • Fluctuating support from members and funding constraints limit its political weight.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 129
Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.