Lifestyle change modelling for climate change mitigation: Complementary strengths, policy support, and research avenues
Lifestyle changes are an essential, complementary measure for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and, therefore, also an important ingredient to climate policy. Computational models of lifestyle changes and their contribution to climate change mitigation can provide valuable insights in support of decision-making by individuals and policymaking. In this Perspective, we examine four modelling approaches with this in mind: input-output analysis, life cycle assessment, integrated assessment models, and agent-based models. They have different strengths and weaknesses related to spatial and temporal scales, sector representation, consumer heterogeneity, and impact assessment. Despite their differences, all are ultimately suitable for modelling different types of climate-friendly lifestyle changes – from sufficiency over efficiency to modal shift measures. Each modelling approach provides useful, albeit partial, insights into lifestyle changes. The identified challenges call for both continual refinements within individual model frameworks and hybrid methods that bridge their respective strengths and allow for representing lifestyle changes more comprehensively. Together, they inform about the theoretical mitigation potential, initiative feasibility, behavioural plasticity, and policy effectiveness of lifestyle changes. Ultimately, cross-disciplinary collaboration will be key to designing lifestyle-focused policies that are both impactful and acceptable. • We examine IOA, LCA, IAM, and ABM modelling approaches regarding lifestyle changes. • Models have complementary strengths, from impact assessment to actor heterogeneity. • Information resulting from such models can support climate policy processes. • Empirical fields are in development as a science & practice, giving partial views. • Interdisciplinarity allows a more comprehensive representation of lifestyle change.
Authors
- Mariësse A.E. van Sluisveld (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-2425)
- Nicole J. van den Berg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2884-7399)
- Anne M. van Valkengoed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2319-4341)
- Stephanie Cap (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7463-2674)
- Arjan de Koning (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-3179)
- Giacomo Marangoni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-380X)
- Ryu Koide
- Laura Scherer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0194-9942)
- Francesca Rubiconto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-5040)
- Agnese Fuortes
- Lynn de Jager
Institutions
- Leiden University (NL)
- Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
- United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (NL)
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
- Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (JP)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Environmental Science & Policy
- Published
- 2025-10-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104256
- Primary Topic
- Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- European Commission
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
- HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu