Strategies of search and patenting under different IPR regimes

Abstract Many scholars observed changes in the intellectual property right (IPR) systems throughout the world in the 1980s and 1990s. Patent systems in particular seemed to be expanding their scope, and the legal system seemed to be changing its attitudes toward IPRs generally. At the same time, and probably in response, firms started to change their patenting behaviour—treating patents as tools of competition and bargaining rather than as a means to protect the fruits of intellectual labour. In this paper we present a simulation model that can be used to discuss that shift. Firms search for new technologies and patent what they find. But different firms have different strategies: one is to protect an invention; a second is to protect a technology space; the third is to attack others’ technology spaces. In the literature the latter two have been described as different types of blocking. We examine different IPR regimes, characterized by who is able to infringe whose patent rights. This is an extreme case of who is able to extract rents from a given configuration of patent rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Corporate Change
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf042
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies of search and patenting under different IPR regimes

Robin Cowan, Ruth Samson, Nicolas Jonard
Industrial and Corporate Change
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Strategies of search and patenting under different IPR regimes

Robin Cowan, Ruth Samson, Nicolas Jonard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many scholars observed changes in the intellectual property right (IPR) systems throughout the world in the 1980s and 1990s. Patent systems in particular seemed to be expanding their scope, and the legal system seemed to be changing its attitudes toward IPRs generally. At the same time, and probably in response, firms started to change their patenting behaviour—treating patents as tools of competition and bargaining rather than as a means to protect the fruits of intellectual labour. In this paper we present a simulation model that can be used to discuss that shift. Firms search for new technologies and patent what they find. But different firms have different strategies: one is to protect an invention; a second is to protect a technology space; the third is to attack others’ technology spaces. In the literature the latter two have been described as different types of blocking. We examine different IPR regimes, characterized by who is able to infringe whose patent rights. This is an extreme case of who is able to extract rents from a given configuration of patent rights.

Industrial and Corporate ChangeVol. 34(6)
Université de Bordeaux (FR), University of Luxembourg (LU), United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (NL), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategies of search and patenting under different IPR regimes — Robin Cowan, Ruth Samson, et al. · Industrial and Corporate Change (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS