“You tested, now what?”: Exploring British Columbian dairy producers' perceptions on Salmonella Dublin management and mitigation

<i>Salmonella</i> Dublin (<i>S.</i> Dublin) is a bacterial disease that affects dairy cattle, causing calf loss, abortions, and reduced milk yield, and is often difficult to control as some animals become chronic carriers. In British Columbia bulk tank milk serology found that 30 % of dairy farms in the province were positive for <i>Salmonella</i> Dublin, which prompted a need for investigation into S. Dublin disease management and mitigation. The objective of this study was to explore BC dairy producers' perceptions and experiences of <i>S</i>. Dublin and how they relate to their actions in <i>S</i>. Dublin management and mitigation, and to leverage this information to inform provincial <i>S</i>. Dublin management programs. Semi-structured interviews were held with 10 BC dairy producers, which were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using the Health Belief Model. Overall, dairy farmers in this study expressed uncertainty surrounding <i>S.</i> Dublin and its management. This uncertainty stemmed from several key sources: 1. Unclear roles and responsibilities regarding disease management among stakeholders, specifically government; 2. Differing views on the necessity of government regulation; 3. Confusion about how information on <i>S.</i> Dublin and disease management is communicated; and 4. Challenges with self-efficacy in the management of <i>S.</i> Dublin. Together, this points towards a need for improved communication and messaging surrounding <i>S.</i> Dublin in BC. Given the perceived value of peer-to-peer communication and narratives, disease messaging may be more effective when coming from sources like producer-led organizations, herd health veterinarians, and "boots on the ground" government officials, as opposed to faceless, top-down government messaging. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of how producers approach S. Dublin management over time and across Canada would strengthen the development of effective strategies for the management of and mitigation of <i>S.</i> Dublin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
One Health
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101250
Primary Topic
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“You tested, now what?”: Exploring British Columbian dairy producers' perceptions on Salmonella Dublin management and mitigation

Chelsea G. Himsworth, Kaylee A. Byers, Ellen Boyd, Erin Cuthbert
One Health
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
article

“You tested, now what?”: Exploring British Columbian dairy producers' perceptions on Salmonella Dublin management and mitigation

Chelsea G. Himsworth, Kaylee A. Byers, Ellen Boyd, Erin Cuthbert
article en

Abstract

<i>Salmonella</i> Dublin (<i>S.</i> Dublin) is a bacterial disease that affects dairy cattle, causing calf loss, abortions, and reduced milk yield, and is often difficult to control as some animals become chronic carriers. In British Columbia bulk tank milk serology found that 30 % of dairy farms in the province were positive for <i>Salmonella</i> Dublin, which prompted a need for investigation into S. Dublin disease management and mitigation. The objective of this study was to explore BC dairy producers' perceptions and experiences of <i>S</i>. Dublin and how they relate to their actions in <i>S</i>. Dublin management and mitigation, and to leverage this information to inform provincial <i>S</i>. Dublin management programs. Semi-structured interviews were held with 10 BC dairy producers, which were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using the Health Belief Model. Overall, dairy farmers in this study expressed uncertainty surrounding <i>S.</i> Dublin and its management. This uncertainty stemmed from several key sources: 1. Unclear roles and responsibilities regarding disease management among stakeholders, specifically government; 2. Differing views on the necessity of government regulation; 3. Confusion about how information on <i>S.</i> Dublin and disease management is communicated; and 4. Challenges with self-efficacy in the management of <i>S.</i> Dublin. Together, this points towards a need for improved communication and messaging surrounding <i>S.</i> Dublin in BC. Given the perceived value of peer-to-peer communication and narratives, disease messaging may be more effective when coming from sources like producer-led organizations, herd health veterinarians, and "boots on the ground" government officials, as opposed to faceless, top-down government messaging. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of how producers approach S. Dublin management over time and across Canada would strengthen the development of effective strategies for the management of and mitigation of <i>S.</i> Dublin.

One HealthVol. 21
University of British Columbia (CA), Simon Fraser University (CA), Government of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.