A Comparative Analysis of TEMPO NO <sub>2</sub> Remote Sensing With Surface‐Level Monitoring Through Diurnal and Seasonal Trends, Meteorology, and Monitor Characteristics

Abstract The NASA Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) instrument—launched in August 2023—measures diurnal patterns of column NO 2 at unprecedented spatial resolution. Given its nascent status, it is unknown how TEMPO V03 column NO 2 compares to surface‐level monitoring across long‐term timescales. In this study, we explore how temporally averaged hourly TEMPO column NO 2 observations compare to surface‐level concentrations from monitors in the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS). Monthly averaged hourly TEMPO vertical column densities (VCDs) correlate to surface‐level NO 2 moderately ( R 2 = 0.42); however, there is notably stronger correlation for monitors that are not defined as “near road” across hourly annual‐average equivalent timescales ( R 2 = 0.61). During the TROPOMI overpass (approximately 13:30 LT), annual‐average TEMPO slant column densities (SCDs) at “not near road” sites are better correlated with surface‐level NO 2 ( R 2 = 0.72) than tropospheric VCDs from TROPOMI ( R 2 = 0.65) and TEMPO ( R 2 = 0.66) due to added uncertainty with a priori inputs in the AMF. In the future, a more accurate AMF could improve TEMPO VCDs correlation to the level of the TEMPO SCDs. TEMPO column NO 2 are most poorly correlated in the early morning at 6:00 ( R 2 = 0.23) and 7:00 ( R 2 = 0.35) LT when TEMPO is less sensitive to near‐surface pollution due to a longer sunlight path through the atmosphere and the subsequent increased sensitivity to retrieval assumptions. Ultimately, this analysis identifies conditions and characteristics that affect the correlation between TEMPO and ground‐level monitoring that has implications for applying TEMPO remote sensing data to derive or interpret surface‐level NO 2 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd043923
Primary Topic
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of TEMPO NO 2 Remote Sensing With Surface‐Level Monitoring Through Diurnal and Seasonal Trends, Meteorology, and Monitor Characteristics

Gaige Hunter Kerr, Laura Judd, M. Omar Nawaz, Daniel E. Huber et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
article

A Comparative Analysis of TEMPO NO 2 Remote Sensing With Surface‐Level Monitoring Through Diurnal and Seasonal Trends, Meteorology, and Monitor Characteristics

Gaige Hunter Kerr, Laura Judd, M. Omar Nawaz, Daniel E. Huber, Daniel L. Goldberg, Summer Joy Acker
article en

Abstract

Abstract The NASA Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) instrument—launched in August 2023—measures diurnal patterns of column NO 2 at unprecedented spatial resolution. Given its nascent status, it is unknown how TEMPO V03 column NO 2 compares to surface‐level monitoring across long‐term timescales. In this study, we explore how temporally averaged hourly TEMPO column NO 2 observations compare to surface‐level concentrations from monitors in the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS). Monthly averaged hourly TEMPO vertical column densities (VCDs) correlate to surface‐level NO 2 moderately ( R 2 = 0.42); however, there is notably stronger correlation for monitors that are not defined as “near road” across hourly annual‐average equivalent timescales ( R 2 = 0.61). During the TROPOMI overpass (approximately 13:30 LT), annual‐average TEMPO slant column densities (SCDs) at “not near road” sites are better correlated with surface‐level NO 2 ( R 2 = 0.72) than tropospheric VCDs from TROPOMI ( R 2 = 0.65) and TEMPO ( R 2 = 0.66) due to added uncertainty with a priori inputs in the AMF. In the future, a more accurate AMF could improve TEMPO VCDs correlation to the level of the TEMPO SCDs. TEMPO column NO 2 are most poorly correlated in the early morning at 6:00 ( R 2 = 0.23) and 7:00 ( R 2 = 0.35) LT when TEMPO is less sensitive to near‐surface pollution due to a longer sunlight path through the atmosphere and the subsequent increased sensitivity to retrieval assumptions. Ultimately, this analysis identifies conditions and characteristics that affect the correlation between TEMPO and ground‐level monitoring that has implications for applying TEMPO remote sensing data to derive or interpret surface‐level NO 2 .

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(20)
Langley Research Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), George Washington University (US), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.