The next Landsat: Mission turning point?

For over fifty years, the Landsat satellite series has provided continuous and comprehensive data for monitoring changes on the Earth's terrestrial surface. Eight successive missions, carrying progressively more sophisticated sensors, with improved radiometric, geometric, and spatial characteristics, have provided an unbroken series of optical and thermal imagery, unparalleled globally. With limited lifetimes for each Landsat satellite, planning of each mission typically overlaps to ensure continuity. Commencing in 2021, planning of a Landsat-9 successor gathered user needs from across the Earth Observation (EO) community, resulting in the Landsat Next (LNext) mission design of three sun-synchronous satellites to acquire reflective and thermal wavelength observations with two to three times the temporal, spatial, and spectral resolution of previous missions. Proposed 2026 U.S. budgets have significantly reduced NASA Earth Science funding. Alternate architectures are now being investigated for Landsat Next that would only meet Landsat-9 design requirements. While this would provide observation continuity, this implies a revised Landsat Next program launched in the early 2030s with nearly 30 year old capabilities, that may acquire data with lower radiometric quality than the current on-orbit Landsat-8 and 9 missions, and that will not support the new capabilities advocated for by the EO user community. This correspondence serves to raise community awareness that the decision is pending, and outlines the observation requirements originally envisioned for LNext and how they were derived to provide context for evaluating the restructured and descoped capability now being considered. • Landsat Next design: twenty-one 10/20-m VSWIR and five 60-m TIR bands. • Three-satellite constellation, six-day global land surface revisit. • Derivation of Landsat Next observation requirements for science and applications. • Descoped mission will not meet future user needs. • Descoped mission risks less, and lower quality, data than current Landsats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing of Environment
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.115087
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The next Landsat: Mission turning point?

Sean P. Healey, Zhe Zhu, David P. Roy, Crystal Schaaf et al.
1 citations
Remote Sensing of Environment
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
1.72
article

The next Landsat: Mission turning point?

Sean P. Healey, Zhe Zhu, David P. Roy, Crystal Schaaf, Patrick Hostert, Michael A. Wulder, T. A. Scambos, Matthew C. Hansen, Volker C. Radeloff, Noel Gorelick, Curtis E. Woodcock, Justin Huntington
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For over fifty years, the Landsat satellite series has provided continuous and comprehensive data for monitoring changes on the Earth's terrestrial surface. Eight successive missions, carrying progressively more sophisticated sensors, with improved radiometric, geometric, and spatial characteristics, have provided an unbroken series of optical and thermal imagery, unparalleled globally. With limited lifetimes for each Landsat satellite, planning of each mission typically overlaps to ensure continuity. Commencing in 2021, planning of a Landsat-9 successor gathered user needs from across the Earth Observation (EO) community, resulting in the Landsat Next (LNext) mission design of three sun-synchronous satellites to acquire reflective and thermal wavelength observations with two to three times the temporal, spatial, and spectral resolution of previous missions. Proposed 2026 U.S. budgets have significantly reduced NASA Earth Science funding. Alternate architectures are now being investigated for Landsat Next that would only meet Landsat-9 design requirements. While this would provide observation continuity, this implies a revised Landsat Next program launched in the early 2030s with nearly 30 year old capabilities, that may acquire data with lower radiometric quality than the current on-orbit Landsat-8 and 9 missions, and that will not support the new capabilities advocated for by the EO user community. This correspondence serves to raise community awareness that the decision is pending, and outlines the observation requirements originally envisioned for LNext and how they were derived to provide context for evaluating the restructured and descoped capability now being considered. • Landsat Next design: twenty-one 10/20-m VSWIR and five 60-m TIR bands. • Three-satellite constellation, six-day global land surface revisit. • Derivation of Landsat Next observation requirements for science and applications. • Descoped mission will not meet future user needs. • Descoped mission risks less, and lower quality, data than current Landsats.

Remote Sensing of EnvironmentVol. 332
Boston University (US), Canadian Forest Service (CA), Natural Resources Canada (CA), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Connecticut (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Rocky Mountain Research Station (US), Rocky Mountain Research (United States) (US), AGSB University (CH), Desert Research Institute (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.