All risks ain't the same – A risk facets perspective on AI-based decision support systems

Artificial intelligence-based decision support systems (AI-DSSs) transform decision-making across diverse contexts including healthcare, finance, and personalized product and service recommendations. Each context exposes users to a dominant risk facet, such as physical risk when using a health-related AI-DSS, financial risk when using a robo-advisor, or psychosocial risk when interacting with an AI-DSS integrated in a social app. Utilizing risk theory, we systematically analyze how different risk facets and severities influence trust in and advice taking from AI-DSSs. We conduct a between-subjects online experiment with 958 participants who interact with AI-DSSs, covering three major risk facets and two risk severities for each. Our results reveal that risk facets and severities partially jointly influence advice taking. Additionally, while advice-taking in physical risk scenarios remains relatively stable across severity levels, financial and psychosocial contexts show significantly greater sensitivity to changes in risk severity. This highlights an interaction effect, demonstrating that the impact of risk severity on advice-taking is partially influenced by the risk facet. Furthermore, we found that trust mediates the effect of risk facet and risk severities on advice taking. Our insights enhance the theoretical understanding of the interplay between risk, trust, and advice taking in human-AI-DSS interaction. We contribute by bridging critical gaps in current literature, enriching the discourse on AI-DSS trust and advice taking in risk-laden environments. This helps developers of AI-DSSs understand the influence of risk facets related to their service and adapt their digital offerings accordingly. • Between-subjects online experiment with participants interacting with AI-DSSs. • Risk facets and risk levels influence trust in and reliance on AI-DSSs. • Trust is a strong predictor for reliance across different AI-DSSs. • The classic hierarchy of needs shifts when interacting with AI-DSSs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Decision Support Systems
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2025.114557
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

All risks ain't the same – A risk facets perspective on AI-based decision support systems

Jobin Strunk, Stefan Smolnik, Anika Nissen
2 citations
Decision Support Systems
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.88
article

All risks ain't the same – A risk facets perspective on AI-based decision support systems

Jobin Strunk, Stefan Smolnik, Anika Nissen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence-based decision support systems (AI-DSSs) transform decision-making across diverse contexts including healthcare, finance, and personalized product and service recommendations. Each context exposes users to a dominant risk facet, such as physical risk when using a health-related AI-DSS, financial risk when using a robo-advisor, or psychosocial risk when interacting with an AI-DSS integrated in a social app. Utilizing risk theory, we systematically analyze how different risk facets and severities influence trust in and advice taking from AI-DSSs. We conduct a between-subjects online experiment with 958 participants who interact with AI-DSSs, covering three major risk facets and two risk severities for each. Our results reveal that risk facets and severities partially jointly influence advice taking. Additionally, while advice-taking in physical risk scenarios remains relatively stable across severity levels, financial and psychosocial contexts show significantly greater sensitivity to changes in risk severity. This highlights an interaction effect, demonstrating that the impact of risk severity on advice-taking is partially influenced by the risk facet. Furthermore, we found that trust mediates the effect of risk facet and risk severities on advice taking. Our insights enhance the theoretical understanding of the interplay between risk, trust, and advice taking in human-AI-DSS interaction. We contribute by bridging critical gaps in current literature, enriching the discourse on AI-DSS trust and advice taking in risk-laden environments. This helps developers of AI-DSSs understand the influence of risk facets related to their service and adapt their digital offerings accordingly. • Between-subjects online experiment with participants interacting with AI-DSSs. • Risk facets and risk levels influence trust in and reliance on AI-DSSs. • Trust is a strong predictor for reliance across different AI-DSSs. • The classic hierarchy of needs shifts when interacting with AI-DSSs.

Decision Support SystemsVol. 199
FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.